Washington!

[Shania]

So this should mean that we are after a target man then.. Grant Holt will pave way for Connor Washington, I feel.

[Brian Wilson]

So this should mean that we are after a target man then.. Grant Holt will pave way for Connor Washington, I feel.

Nah, Barry Hayles I'm hearing #itk

[bakes8]

Nah, Barry Hayles I'm hearing #itk

Ched Evans?

................I'll get me coat.

[Ginger Ninja]

So this should mean that we are after a target man then.. Grant Holt will pave way for Connor Washington, I feel.

Grant Holt can fark right off.

[Gtleighsr3]

Get the beast in

[Hitman34]

Mark hately.

[Rangers77]

Denzel Washington. Ah ha. OK. Alright. Hm hm.

[Hove Ranger]

Grant holt plays for Hibs in Scottish Champ

[West London is Rss]

if you tell me where the post was inaccurate I might be able to help you. Engaging the brain can be useful.

There's supplying with data, and then there's just drivel in paragraphs.

Understanding the game can also be helpful, rather than just understanding 'data'.

[WeAreQPR12]

Good to have Holloway a manager that makes his own decisions. He can clearly see that Washington hasn't been given a fair crack and can see plenty of positives to his game

[hal9thou]

There's supplying with data, and then there's just drivel in paragraphs.

Understanding the game can also be helpful, rather than just understanding 'data'.

Mate, I pointed out that there is the data and then there's how you interpret it.

I think Naz is spot on about Washington and the evidence of my eyes as well as the data (be it 1.5 or 3 goals) appears to confirm this. You don't. If you think he's a decent player, a useful goalscorer
that's fine we can all agree to disagree. But it isn't Naz's stats that causes a problem, its when he uses them to support of a position that others disagree with that winds people up. But he does tend to support his pov with data. Which was kind of what I said in the first place.

[West London is Rss]

Mate, I pointed out that there is the data and then there's how you interpret it.

I think Naz is spot on about Washington and the evidence of my eyes as well as the data (be it 1.5 or 3 goals) appears to confirm this. You don't. If you think he's a decent player, a useful goalscorer
that's fine we can all agree to disagree. But it isn't Naz's stats that causes a problem, its when he uses them to support of a position that others disagree with that winds people up. But he does tend to support his pov with data. Which was kind of what I said in the first place.

Ahhhh now I'm getting it and getting into it... you're defending him overall because you agree with him on Washington - should of just said that...

On a side note, you aren't Nassers lovechild are you?

[Hubble]

“When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser.”

Socrates

[hal9thou]

I said months ago I agreed with Naz on CW. I thought it was a dodgy signing in the first place.

Naz and I have had loads of run ins: I didn't want JFH here for example, and Naz defended him.

But on Washington we agree. You think he's decent at this level. And you claim to understand the game..... course you do.

[Stanley]

“When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser.”

Socrates

Slander is of course unhelpful. The debate is far from lost though, as has been clearly demonstrated throughout the thread.

Ultimately it just comes down to differences of opinion, and Washington is certainly one who divides them.

However I think the majority of us now have faith in our manager, and as he said yesterday:

“Washington is a huge part of my plans – I just want people to be patient.”

- Ian Holloway