Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

20/21 QPR Transfer Page

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • maidstone_hoop
    Gold Seat
    • May 2009
    • 6718

    #286
    SSN now saying Eze was left out because we didn’t want to risk him get injured as interest is intensifying in him from Prem clubs.

    Also said Fulham have joined the race to sign him and right now are the most likely to meet our 20m valuation.

    Not nice seeing a star player going to a rival but tbh I wouldn’t be that bothered as long as we got the full 20
    plus mill we want as I know what stability that could bring to us aswell as allowing us to maybe go and bring in4 or 5 decent players.

    How would you feel if Eze goes Fulham?

    Comment

    • Jeffqpr
      Silver Seat
      • Jun 2015
      • 1832

      #287
      Originally posted by maidstone_hoop
      SSN now saying Eze was left out because we didn’t want to risk him get injured as interest is intensifying in him from Prem clubs.

      Also said Fulham have joined the race to sign him and right now are the most likely to meet our 20m valuation.

      Not nice seeing a star player going to a rival but tbh I wouldn’t be that bothered as long as we got the full 20
      plus mill we want as I know what stability that could bring to us aswell as allowing us to maybe go and bring in4 or 5 decent players.

      How would you feel if Eze goes Fulham?
      Not that bothered where he goes as long as we get decent money for him, out of clubs mentioned & for his future I would chose Arsenal but there again would he get game time?

      Comment

      • Stainrod
        Silver Seat
        • Jan 2018
        • 3162

        #288
        Yeah it’s about who is willing to pay the most basically, although I have to say if it was Fulham it would stick in the throat a bit .

        Comment

        • QPRDave
          The number 10
          • Mar 2009
          • 32061

          #289
          5 clubs interested in Eze apparently incuding fools wba and toon.
          Surely someone can get closer to the 20 mill valuation than 12 mill ?

          Comment

          • QPRDave
            The number 10
            • Mar 2009
            • 32061

            #290
            Originally posted by Jeffqpr

            Not that bothered where he goes as long as we get decent money for him, out of clubs mentioned & for his future I would chose Arsenal but there again would he get game time?
            Surely arsenal or the toon would be the teams to sign for?

            Comment

            • QPRDave
              The number 10
              • Mar 2009
              • 32061

              #291
              Originally posted by Stainrod
              Yeah it’s about who is willing to pay the most basically, although I have to say if it was Fulham it would stick in the throat a bit .
              We can get him back for ####all in two or three years for nothing mind, ala The legend that is Lee Cook!

              Comment

              • SheepRanger
                Administrator
                • Apr 2018
                • 8341

                #292
                I wouldnt want him going to Fulham because we would probably miss out survival bonuses. But if he played well and they were relegated we might get more from a sell on clause?

                Comment

                • LoftusRoadLad
                  W12 Seat
                  • Jan 2011
                  • 19582

                  #293
                  Oh not the Fools..We wont hear the last of it...We could get em in a cup game ! Now that would be

                  Comment

                  • stanistheman
                    Platinum Seat
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 11151

                    #294
                    I think he could be a good fit for Arsenal if he made it in their team. As long as QPR get a minimum £20m or close to that with a good player in exchange like Hugill I am not really bothered.

                    Comment

                    • SheepRanger
                      Administrator
                      • Apr 2018
                      • 8341

                      #295
                      Originally posted by stanistheman
                      I think he could be a good fit for Arsenal if he made it in their team. As long as QPR get a minimum £20m or close to that with a good player in exchange like Hugill I am not really bothered.
                      Not sure we should take £5m off the top of £20m for Hugill. It's still £5m and he would be 31yrs old at the end of a 3yr deal with no sell on value.

                      Norwich have just had an opening bid of £3m + £2m add ons for Hugill rejected by WHU. So it's going to take the full £5m to get him.

                      I would rather use that £5m towards signing two players with resale value in that 24yr old range, which seems to be our strategy. Dont ask me who, but I think the club know they're out there. I'm sure there will be fringe strikers that clubs will begging to loan out come late Sept too.

                      Comment

                      • Stainrod
                        Silver Seat
                        • Jan 2018
                        • 3162

                        #296
                        Originally posted by SheepRanger

                        Not sure we should take £5m off the top of £20m for Hugill. It's still £5m and he would be 31yrs old at the end of a 3yr deal with no sell on value.

                        Norwich have just had an opening bid of £3m + £2m add ons for Hugill rejected by WHU. So it's going to take the full £5m to get him.

                        I would rather use that £5m towards signing two players with resale value in that 24yr old range, which seems to be our strategy. Dont ask me who, but I think the club know they're out there. I'm sure there will be fringe strikers that clubs will begging to loan out come late Sept too.
                        Agree with this , fee to high , wages to much and no sell on value . Thanks Jordan but best to look elsewhere for some value especially as we have Dykes already.

                        Comment

                        • QPRDave
                          The number 10
                          • Mar 2009
                          • 32061

                          #297
                          Originally posted by SheepRanger

                          Not sure we should take £5m off the top of £20m for Hugill. It's still £5m and he would be 31yrs old at the end of a 3yr deal with no sell on value.

                          Norwich have just had an opening bid of £3m + £2m add ons for Hugill rejected by WHU. So it's going to take the full £5m to get him.

                          I would rather use that £5m towards signing two players with resale value in that 24yr old range, which seems to be our strategy. Dont ask me who, but I think the club know they're out there. I'm sure there will be fringe strikers that clubs will begging to loan out come late Sept too.
                          That was my thoughts exactly.
                          No way we should be giving up on 5mill for him, be it a loan or permanent

                          Comment

                          • QPRDave
                            The number 10
                            • Mar 2009
                            • 32061

                            #298
                            Originally posted by Stainrod

                            Agree with this , fee to high , wages to much and no sell on value . Thanks Jordan but best to look elsewhere for some value especially as we have Dykes already.
                            Thats what I was saying the other day about the loan stains, not worth it.
                            But you and Rebel were arguing it was a realistic deal.

                            Comment

                            • Stainrod
                              Silver Seat
                              • Jan 2018
                              • 3162

                              #299
                              Originally posted by QPRDave

                              Thats what I was saying the other day about the loan stains, not worth it.
                              But you and Rebel were arguing it was a realistic deal.
                              Don’t get me wrong if we could get him on another season long loan on the same terms as last year , I’d go for it . Taking him on a permanent deal as some kind of makeweight in an Eze deal don’t sit to well .It seems like Norwich are in a much better position to match his valuation than we are anyway .

                              Comment

                              • SheepRanger
                                Administrator
                                • Apr 2018
                                • 8341

                                #300
                                Alfie Mawaon in Fulham deal for Eze

                                Queens Park Rangers are interested in signing Fulham defender Alfie Mawson as part of a potential deal that could see Eberechi Eze head to the Premier League club, according to The Sun journalist Alan Nixon.

                                Comment

                                Working...