Originally posted by Del
View Post
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Rio passes medical
Collapse
X
-
Are you saying that his memory did not fail him and he in fact deliberately missed the drugs test? That makes him even worse.Banning people is no longer my hobby,
but take a look at my photo blog:
http://kirillqpr.blogspot.com/
How and why did I start supporting QPR in Estonia:
http://www.wearetherangersboys.com/forum/blog.php?b=852
-
Any player can get injured at any time but there is more chance of a young player improving their injury record and them as a footballer than a 35 year old also younger players recover quicker from injuriesOriginally posted by West Acton View PostIts not more acceptable at all W12 and you have just nailed it its about fitting into a structure and the same must apply to older players. It so frustrating listening to some say injury prone steer clear their old etc when there are just as many young players with equally bad and worse injury records (I named three earlier) then 30 year olds
You can get injury just as easily as an 18 year old as you can as a 38 year old. Your argument appears to be its ok to pay a young player 60k a week if their injured but not a 35 year old. If you injured and not playing regardless of your age your costing the club money simples
We're not going to agree on this signing but if he does well as Nelson and Dunne as you mention then great but lets hope its not at the expense of a player like Onuora who deserves to be 1st choice Centre back next seasonWe Are The People.....
Comment
-
Your tying yourself in all sorts of knots as your totally contradicting what you have said previous. Your argument is that we should not be investing in injury prone players well Faurlin if were being honest is a nailed on injury prone player who has missed the best part of two seasons in two years. Yes the club have been loyal but this argument is not about the club being loyal its about your view of not signing crocks so I ask the question again should he have given a new contract???Originally posted by Rangersw12 View PostOffering a deal to Faurlin is about showing loyalty to a player who has given us excellent service over the years no problem with that at all
Now I like and do rate Faurlin and am glad he got a renewal but if were splitting hairs this excellent service you refer was one season in the championship as he has been injured more or less non stop since then, does one season warrant the phrase 'Excellent Service'
Comment
-
that's the point Dave If I am honest without googling him I could not tell you anything about him and would have to guess if he was white, black or indifferent I have no idea.Originally posted by Bigdave View PostDo you know what you are right westie. Even I am guilty of wanting the forest boy to sign when I can't remember seeing him play either. But because we have bid 4m I automatically assume he is the bees knees
Before he came up as a possible signing I had never heard of him
Comment
-
We could sign Messi tomo for £1 and he could do a Richard Ord on us. Every signing u make there is gonna be risk.
Rio on a free and a (reported) £2m a year in wages is an absolute bargain and well worth a couple of years in my book.
....... When u think of all the money we spunked away the last few years.......
Comment
-
My hope would be he is another Dunne or Nelson but there is no assurance of that just as there is not Wilshires record will get any better who is youngOriginally posted by Rangersw12 View PostAny player can get injured at any time but there is more chance of a young player improving their injury record and them as a footballer than a 35 year old also younger players recover quicker from injuries
We're not going to agree on this signing but if he does well as Nelson and Dunne as you mention then great but lets hope its not at the expense of a player like Onuora who deserves to be 1st choice Centre back next season
I would argue there is evidence injuries do clear up with age if you use Giggs and Gerrard as example could not get a run of games out of them when they were teens and in their early 20s but then after their bodies finished developing more or less ever presents for their clubs
Comment
-
-
I've got an FA coaching badge. I've got a bit of a clueOriginally posted by West London is Rss View PostPeople who are slating this signing do not have a clue about football
By the way, how many other prem clubs came in for Rio? Only seen Villa.Supporting QPR isn't just about a football team. It's about roots and identity.
Comment
-
On this basis you'd sign John Terry too?Originally posted by West London is Rss View PostSo all those medals and trophies his won count for nothing and he should be seen as a bad professional cos his made a couple of mistakes.
Why do you think Harry is saying Caulker would love to play with Rio? Because he knows that young english centre backs will look up to a player like RioSupporting QPR isn't just about a football team. It's about roots and identity.
Comment
-
-
Football wise, a club like ours would be idiotic to turn down a player of John Terrys quality. Especially if on a free and low wages as Rio is reportedly.Originally posted by QPR Richard View PostOn this basis you'd sign John Terry too?
Bloke wouldn't get through the door without being killed mind......
Comment
-
IMO, he's way past his best, has a significant injury record, a convicted drink driver, and a drugs test dodger.Originally posted by West Acton View PostRichard you appear to have a huge vendetta against Rio you cannot or refuse to see any of the benefits of his presence around the squad interested to know why you are so entrenched in your position as although you have argued against his signing you have in my view failed to offer a up a conclusive case against it
Whats your real problem with him????
Several issues which have been conveniently been forgotten in the stampede to sign a name.Supporting QPR isn't just about a football team. It's about roots and identity.
Comment
-
You asked this questions yesterday and your trying to be emotive an playing games. For footballing reasons only if offered and affordable and better then we had then yes but football is tribal and many will say no because he is a c ock and ChelseaOriginally posted by QPR Richard View PostOn this basis you'd sign John Terry too?
You have still not said if you would sign injury prone players like Walcott and Wilshire who would be very expensive if given the opportunity???
Comment
Comment