Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Arsenal agree personal terms with Remy
Collapse
X
-
Sorry for my naivety here, but if TF has publicly said Remy has no buy out clause then am I right in thinking no matter what Remy wants (to join a champions league team) he has no say? Meaning if we wanted to we could simply not sell him and have him and Austin playing up front next season?
SIR LESLIE FERDINAND!!Comment
-
But you forget Tony's a nice guy, he will grant the wish.Sorry for my naivety here, but if TF has publicly said Remy has no buy out clause then am I right in thinking no matter what Remy wants (to join a champions league team) he has no say? Meaning if we wanted to we could simply not sell him and have him and Austin playing up front next season?Comment
-
Comment
-
And Harry has said he has, no one of us has any real clue.
We also don't know what, if anything is happening in terms of bids received, how much Remy has talked with other clubs. All paper talk on those so far.
As with all these things it's fun to discuss the likely scenarios though.
As I've said, I'd be surprised if we got him without significant incentives, beyond wages and London
I also wouldn't be surprised if there is no clause but we still get shafted over the sale price. We are QPR after all, and I don't think we've come out of a transfer in significant profit since Les.Comment
-
This suggests that the buy clause expired at the end of the season.
Comment
-
I keep seeing this argument and I don't buy it. Didn't we give him a big pay rise? Otherwise why would he have come to us? So we definitely held that card and it was an important one. We could have just walked away if he didn't agree to terms that were fair to us.Very possibly, I still think that he never intended to be a QPR player after those 6 months. And I think we'd have needed to have included a set fee for him to leave, to get him to sign.
His agent held all the cards in any negotiation that's for sure, and we shouldn't be surprised that any clause was not to our benefit.
If he still has a buy out clause, and I'm convinced he does, then I think that was some very weak negotiating by the club.'Only a Ranger!' cried Gandalf. 'My dear Frodo, that is just what the Rangers are: the last remnant in the South of the great people, the Men of West London.' - Lord of the Rings, Book II, Chapter I - Many Meetings.Comment
-
How is us offering him high wages a card that we held?I keep seeing this argument and I don't buy it. Didn't we give him a big pay rise? Otherwise why would he have come to us? So we definitely held that card and it was an important one. We could have just walked away if he didn't agree to terms that were fair to us.
If he still has a buy out clause, and I'm convinced he does, then I think that was some very weak negotiating by the club.
We were desperate for a striker with real quality. Not an easy thing to find at a reasonable price in the January window.Comment
-
Yes he held all the cards, it was desperation from us. It was the same window that saw Samba bought for £12.5m & sold back as soon as we went down for £12m, never seen that before.
It was clear Remy held all the cards, HR described us as a stepping stone for him.
One thing though is the fact we are back in the big time, TF will be a lot harder and have learnt lessons, get rid of Remy and reduce wages and bring in players more like CA, got the right mentality and probably half the wage.
Need to stop being a joke of a galactico type club and start being QPR, I saw signs last Saturday that that might not be far off.Comment
-
Or £10m plus a couple of fringe players. Would love to see Rosicky in the Hoops... sorry part hoops part white patch.Comment
Comment