Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Sylla done well

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Norths
    CCG
    • Jan 2011
    • 13067

    #16
    Unfortunately Jimmy doesn't know how to setup a team to play two up top.

    Comment

    • nasser95
      Gold Seat
      • Dec 2012
      • 7216

      #17
      Originally posted by lymehoop
      he shouldn't play Conor in a lone striker role, think he would have been a lot happier partnering BFG. Jimmy's done a hatchet job on Washington imo
      He shouldn't play Conor at all. How many excuses do people want to give the guy. He can't adapt to playing alone? He's had 8 months knowing that he will be playing lone striker and he hasn't adapted. He's given opportunities over players who score goals and keeps getting subbed off, only for us to finally score when he's off the pitch. It happened today, it happened a few times last season and it will keep happening if he's given a starting role. He's our 3rd in line striker now and he could have been our regular starter if he took his chances like Sylla's done, like Polter's done and like the next striker we sign will undoubtedly do.
      "What stats allow you to do is not take things at face value. The idea that I trust my eyes more than the stats, I just don't buy that because I've seen magicians pull rabbits out of hats and I know I just know that rabbit's not in there." - Billy Beane

      Comment

      • MattyRangers
        Slimmer of The Year
        • Jun 2011
        • 24914

        #18
        Bang on Nasser
        You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.

        Comment

        • 1QPRDK
          Silver Seat
          • Feb 2013
          • 2151

          #19
          Originally posted by MattyRangers
          I'm all for thinking outside the box but I cant see circumsizing two of our midfielders helping tbh.
          How about we start a Male Genital Mutilation thread, just to balance out the preferential treatment given to FGM threads on LFW.
          https://twitter.com/1qprdk

          Comment

          • Brian Wilson
            Silver Seat
            • Jul 2009
            • 4400

            #20
            Originally posted by nasser95
            He shouldn't play Conor at all. How many excuses do people want to give the guy. He can't adapt to playing alone? He's had 8 months knowing that he will be playing lone striker and he hasn't adapted. He's given opportunities over players who score goals and keeps getting subbed off, only for us to finally score when he's off the pitch. It happened today, it happened a few times last season and it will keep happening if he's given a starting role. He's our 3rd in line striker now and he could have been our regular starter if he took his chances like Sylla's done, like Polter's done and like the next striker we sign will undoubtedly do.
            Question is why did Les & Jimmy buy him if he clearly cant play in the preferred system?

            Comment

            • 1QPRDK
              Silver Seat
              • Feb 2013
              • 2151

              #21
              Originally posted by Brian Wilson
              Question is why did Les & Jimmy buy him if he clearly cant play in the preferred system?
              What you lose on the swings...
              https://twitter.com/1qprdk

              Comment

              • Fordy
                Silver Seat
                • May 2011
                • 4281

                #22
                Originally posted by MattyRangers
                I'm all for thinking outside the box but I cant see circumsizing two of our midfielders helping tbh.
                Less skin. More streamline. Faster

                Comment

                • MattyRangers
                  Slimmer of The Year
                  • Jun 2011
                  • 24914

                  #23
                  Originally posted by Fordy
                  Less skin. More streamline. Faster
                  You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.

                  Comment

                  • Brian Wilson
                    Silver Seat
                    • Jul 2009
                    • 4400

                    #24
                    Originally posted by 1QPRDK
                    What you lose on the swings...
                    sure but 3 mil is the biggest fee we paid in a while

                    Comment

                    • nasser95
                      Gold Seat
                      • Dec 2012
                      • 7216

                      #25
                      Originally posted by Brian Wilson
                      Question is why did Les & Jimmy buy him if he clearly cant play in the preferred system?
                      Every half decent player in world football should be able to adapt to some degree to a style of play with enough training. Take Austin as an example of a player who some said couldn't play alone up front yet scored 11 champ goals doing so in half a season. CW hasn't adapted, it happens, but that's not to say the decision to buy him was a wrong one, it's just that now that we know, he should be on an exit list. For his sake and ours.
                      "What stats allow you to do is not take things at face value. The idea that I trust my eyes more than the stats, I just don't buy that because I've seen magicians pull rabbits out of hats and I know I just know that rabbit's not in there." - Billy Beane

                      Comment

                      • 1973 ranger
                        Gold Seat
                        • Aug 2012
                        • 5990

                        #26
                        Charlie Austin has the size to play up front and is a big lad, Young Conor is a more nippy striker so very hard to compare the two.

                        Comment

                        • MattyRangers
                          Slimmer of The Year
                          • Jun 2011
                          • 24914

                          #27
                          Originally posted by 1973 ranger
                          Charlie Austin has the size to play up front and is a big lad, Young Conor is a more nippy striker so very hard to compare the two.
                          Nasser in bang on though, how many more excuses will we make for Washington? It's pretty clear to see the lad is way out of his depth. Nothing against him, he does work hard, but he just isn't anywhere near good enough.
                          You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.

                          Comment

                          • Fordy
                            Silver Seat
                            • May 2011
                            • 4281

                            #28
                            How did Borysuik play when he came on West?

                            Comment

                            • MattyRangers
                              Slimmer of The Year
                              • Jun 2011
                              • 24914

                              #29
                              Originally posted by Fordy
                              How did Borysuik play when he came on West?
                              Answering on his behalf, personally thought he done well, without being outstanding. Seemed fairly assured and kept possession well. Think he could be a good player, but hard to judge too much coming into such a $hit game.
                              You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.

                              Comment

                              • 1973 ranger
                                Gold Seat
                                • Aug 2012
                                • 5990

                                #30
                                Matty, He may well turn out to be a total dud but I think to get the best out of him may require two up top which is unlikely to happy under this manager.

                                Comment

                                Working...