Preston Match Thread

[LoftusRoadLad]

Another must win game !!!

[LoftusRoadLad]

Escaria Ten

is wearing a QPR top

[WeAreQPR12]

I think the silence says it all. I think we're all done with rangers this season. The season really has become more flat than the Netherlands.

[Darkranger]

Escaria Ten

is wearing a QPR top

I have put my money on it, figured I haven't lost quite enough backing the hoops this year.

[SheepRanger]

It will be great just to get one point to build a bit of confidence. I'd love to see a Dykes and Gray partnership, but doubt that will happen.

[KevC59]

My enthusiasm is about as low as it could be right now, but would still hope for a much improved performance, and some sort of result to stop the rot if nothing else

[eam1882]

It's official I've gone crazy.
just put tenner on rangers to win.
23 to 10.
COURsss

[Qprtanpa1]

Let’s see MW try to save his job and/or the fans’ support by going 442 today.

Dykes and Gray up front.
Field, Amos, Chair, Stefan in middle
McCallum, Barbet, Dunne and Dickie in the back.

Would at least give us long overdue hope that MW is shedding his formation stubborness in a rush of reality.

[72bus]

Let’s see MW try to save his job and/or the fans’ support by going 442 today.

Dykes and Gray up front.
Field, Amos, Chair, Stefan in middle
McCallum, Barbet, Dunne and Dickie in the back.

Would at least give us long overdue hope that MW is shedding his formation stubborness in a rush of reality.

I stopped reading at stefan

[Rebel R's]

Win lose or draw it makes no difference now in relation to the play offs but finishing in 8th place is still a realistic target .
1-1 today

[Qprtanpa1]

I stopped reading at stefan

Okay. Not wild about Stefan either. Who? Thomas?

[QPRDave]

433

[LoftusRoadLad]

[Cooky10538]

Stream anyone please?

[lincoln ranger]

442 according to BBC. With Field on the right where he'll be totally wasted.

It’s got to be 4-3-3 as there are no naturally wide players in that MF 4, so I would expect Chair and Stef to play off Dykes. Could be 4-3-2-1? Or 4-2-3-1? The big massive difference is that it looks like we have gone 4 at the back at last! Come on you Rrs!