Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Hazard just mugged the ball boy
Collapse
X
-
Top Scorers 2018/2019
Nakhi Wells - 8
Pawel Wszolek - 6
Luke Freeman - 6
Matt Smith - 6
Ebere Eze - 4
Joel Lynch - 3
Tomer Hemed - 3
Toni Leistner - 2
Massimo Luongo- 2
Angel Rangel - 2
Bright Osayi-Samuel - 2
Geoff Cameron - 1
Aramide Oteh - 1
Jake Bidwell - 1
Jordan Cousins - 1
Summer Transfers 2019
IN
OUT -
He was hardly a child. He's a young man. In fact there's so little age gap between them they'd have been at school together! Well if they went to school in Wales that is...
Comment
-
difference is but Hazard will get 2 game ban because he plays for the poor persecuted SCUM and Joey would have got a 20 game ban. Chelsea rally are a crasse outfit the statements they put out on twitter claiming evidently blaming the ball boy was to blame? what with Terry Clatenberg And this, thay oviously think they can do anything and it's never their fault.Comment
-
Just heard that he has tweeted that Hazard's only crime was that he didn't kick the boy hard enough!!!!!!!!!!!#standuptocancer
#inyourfacecancerComment
-
The kid was talking on his twitter account about time-wasting before the match yesterday....Comment
-
LONDON CALLING TO THE ZOMBIES OF DEATH.... ALSO KNOW AS BRENTFORD FANS
Comment
-
Did you know that at the time of the incident? Because I didn't. And I suspect Hazard didn't either, which is kind of the point really.Comment
-
This is where the FAs logic really is questionable. Hazard already is subject to a 3 game ban. There is no question of the offence. The FA will now hold next week and behind closed doors a hearing which will be there to look at the length of ban they can not impose a fine. Terry was found guilty of a far more serious incident and was given a 4 game ban I know many questioned the length of the ban but the fact reamins thats what he was given.
If you listen to just about every manager(including Harry) they are saying enough is enough on this. Irrespective clearly the FA realise the ball boy caused the issue (no defence to Hazard) so why arent Swansea facing a disrepute carge for the actions of one of their support staff?Comment
-
I'd guess because they'd have to charge every club for the offence. Lately many people have been coming out saying how common practice it is.
Even had Vila's Matt Lowton say Neil Warnock did a tactical traning course for ball boys haha.
Comment
-
Jog on you Chelsea mugThis is where the FAs logic really is questionable. Hazard already is subject to a 3 game ban. There is no question of the offence. The FA will now hold next week and behind closed doors a hearing which will be there to look at the length of ban they can not impose a fine. Terry was found guilty of a far more serious incident and was given a 4 game ban I know many questioned the length of the ban but the fact reamins thats what he was given.
If you listen to just about every manager(including Harry) they are saying enough is enough on this. Irrespective clearly the FA realise the ball boy caused the issue (no defence to Hazard) so why arent Swansea facing a disrepute carge for the actions of one of their support staff?Comment
Comment