Gianni Paladini /merged/

[Bernie's Barnet]

Put into Prespective Paul Hart was booed much more loudly when we had 8 defenders and Taarabt against Barnsley 5-2 win in 2009.
You could see mackie man hug Paladini and the idiot with the mic, just put it in front of him. He definitely wasn't looking for the mic

I just wish fans would have enjoyed the experience on a great day for the club, something none of us thought would ever happened.

Well done Warnock, his backroom staff, the squad and all the boardroom staff.

Great day to be a QPR fan, never will be forgotten

Put into actual perspective, Jim "The Nutter" Magilton was in charge of us when we beat Barnsley 5-2. And there was no booing that day.

[brightonr]

Put into actual perspective, Jim "The Nutter" Magilton was in charge of us when we beat Barnsley 5-2. And there was no booing that day.

I think you'll find he's referring to 2 different occasions. And cannot believe you cannot remember the booing at each of them.

[brightonr]

Think it's a waste of time discussing this subject on here. Despite all the evidence against, we just get told that every accusation (and there's been a few) against the guy is just unsubstantiated hearsay and that everyone on here and the press has fabricated all the stories against him. Why thousands of us would do that just for sheer bedevilment is beyond me?

I can sort of see where you're coming from Russ, but on the flip side, surely these "thousands" you refer to could come up with one piece of evidence that would stand up to scrutiny and make it impossible for him to be defended by those you feel do it for the sake of it. I'm just wondering what's holding them back.

[RussRanger]

Well I think the whole Blackfriar's court case that got thrown out was a good example. And the stitching up of Ian Holloway are well documented pieces of evidence against him but I'm sure we'll get told that Ian Holloway lied in his book (if so, why didn't Gianni sue him?) and that the court case was just a Dallas type dream sequence that never existed.

I actually admire Pete for his loyalty to the guy but he does seem to portray Gianni as the most misunderstood guy since Bill and Ben.

[brightonr]

Well I think the whole Blackfriar's court case that got thrown out was a good example. And the stitching up of Ian Holloway are well documented pieces of evidence against him but I'm sure we'll get told that Ian Holloway lied in his book (if so, why didn't Gianni sue him?) and that the court case was just a Dallas type dream sequence that never existed.

I actually admire Pete for his loyalty to the guy but he does seem to portray Gianni as the most misunderstood guy since Bill and Ben.

When you say "stitching" of Holloway, do you mean not being happy that he wanted to talk to Leicester? Wouldn't be the last time that particular dalliance resulted in him walking away from a club, would it?

Not trying to be pedantic Russ, just looking at it from a different perspective.

[Hoopaman]

Yep, Paladini charged with two offences, submitting false documentation, and bringing the game into disrepute...

He was cleared of 1 offence...

Love the way it gets backed up with links to the FA and is blatantly ignored by Pete and James1979 who go off a tangent between them for a page at least to sink this minor detail.

I thought if Paladini was found guilty he had to go. That was what both Pete and isleworth said. Well theres the evidence. First page, linked to the FA's website.

The whole points deduction debacle was Paladinis fault.

How that can be covered up not even a week since it's end is beyond me. The hearing brought the clubs name into disrepute. Other clubs call us cheats. The media were all over us like a rash. Thank **** we didn't get a points deduction but if that had of happened certain posters on here would STILL defend the man!

[Morris]

3 pages already and we haven't even read the article!

[IsleworthRanger]

Love the way it gets backed up with links to the FA and is blatantly ignored by Pete and James1979 who go off a tangent between them for a page at least to sink this minor detail.

I thought if Paladini was found guilty he had to go. That was what both Pete and isleworth said. Well theres the evidence. First page, linked to the FA's website.

The whole points deduction debacle was Paladinis fault.

How that can be covered up not even a week since it's end is beyond me. The hearing brought the clubs name into disrepute. Other clubs call us cheats. The media were all over us like a rash. Thank **** we didn't get a points deduction but if that had of happened certain posters on here would STILL defend the man!

And I have repeated that mamy many times and stand by it but some prefer to just ignore that point and continue to chip away (not referring to you by the way in this instance)

[terry ball]

Love the way it gets backed up with links to the FA and is blatantly ignored by Pete and James1979 who go off a tangent between them for a page at least to sink this minor detail.

I thought if Paladini was found guilty he had to go. That was what both Pete and isleworth said. Well theres the evidence. First page, linked to the FA's website.

The whole points deduction debacle was Paladinis fault.

How that can be covered up not even a week since it's end is beyond me. The hearing brought the clubs name into disrepute. Other clubs call us cheats. The media were all over us like a rash. Thank **** we didn't get a points deduction but if that had of happened certain posters on here would STILL defend the man!

This is what's frustrating mate, people support paladini over the club. We know what they said but they never ment it. Paladini is the gravy train driver and no matter what he does some won't ever accept he is a liability.

It would be interesting to hear brightons views on the 2 charges as he is nice and balanced. Does he see that paladini is accountable?

[IsleworthRanger]

This is what's frustrating mate, people support paladini over the club. We know what they said but they never ment it. Paladini is the gravy train driver and no matter what he does some won't ever accept he is a liability.

It would be interesting to hear brightons views on the 2 charges as he is nice and balanced. Does he see that paladini is accountable?

Genuine question but has Paladini been proved yet to be responsible for one of the guilty charges as from what I have seen so far he was found not guilty (un proven) on one of the origional two charges and the other seems to have disappeared but that may have been in agreement with the FA so the club as a whole rather then as an individual were found guilty?

[The Merry Ploughboy]

The backtracking and defending of the Buffoon is cringeworthy and wrong on so many levels
Fark off Gianni

[RussRanger]

When you say "stitching" of Holloway, do you mean not being happy that he wanted to talk to Leicester? Wouldn't be the last time that particular dalliance resulted in him walking away from a club, would it?

Not trying to be pedantic Russ, just looking at it from a different perspective.

Or the alternative view...

That Paladini accepted a call from Leicester and gave him permission and actively urged him to go and speak to Leicester leaving Holloway to believe he was no longer wanted at the club.

And then when Holloway talks to Leicester, Gianni puts him on "gardening leave" and comes out with "If you are happy in your marriage, why go and look somewhere else?"

[Connell10]

as i said in another thread, the man really does divide the fanbase and for that reason he should go! we want harmony not all this ******! so bye bye gianni!

[IsleworthRanger]

as i said in another thread, the man really does divide the fanbase and for that reason he should go! we want harmony not all this ******! so bye bye gianni!

Dont think there will ever be harmony again within the fanbase at least not for many many years

Too much real hatred out there

[paulmason]

Genuine question but has Paladini been proved yet to be responsible for one of the guilty charges as from what I have seen so far he was found not guilty (un proven) on one of the origional two charges and the other seems to have disappeared but that may have been in agreement with the FA so the club as a whole rather then as an individual were found guilty?

Out of the 7 charges, 5 were unproven and 2 were proven. What would be good to know would be what five charges were dropped and what 2 charges were proven, costing us £825,000.

After we know that information, people can see if GP was guilty of anything or not and see if he should stay or go, as everyone agreed if he was guilty of anything, he should go. Someone was responsible for the 2 charges and nobody should be able to hide behind it was 'QPR FC that was charged'.