Would banning The Stirrers Benefit this Board??

[Fawny]

Pete, you and I know the answer to this but how many people have come up to you and said 'Great site, love it' and how many have said anything negertive?

That says it all and it's only Internet talk... reality is different.

I think it's best just to ignore those people and move on.

I voted 'No'

Shut up myu, pete says you're first one banned anyway

[Robsondinho]

Becks is out the world cup how said...agree?





Just testing hijacking skills.....

Get my coat

[Sharpy]

"but its being let down by each and every thread being hijacked"

Bye James

[SirLes]

How are you going to seperate stirring from a simple difference of opinion?

[MYU]

I've now added Hi-jacking thread to the infractions system which gives them 3 points, another one and they are gone.

[qblockpete]

Sharpy, if the meeting was about that, than maybe you have a point.

Thats the point, why is the owner of a site not representative on views simply about fans getting an affordable price to watch games, ditching the gold, silver and bronze sections etc

I am not a spokesman, thats why the thread in the first place, so I can put those points forward made by fans. If I was just steaming ahead, I'd be putting forward my personal concerns and not asking for fans input, yours included. I simply have a vehicle to come back on replies to those points put forward, on which I will try in the short space of time to put across.

Think we maybe the only board who has asked its members, for suggestions. ( could be wrong) So, we cannot be that bad.

[Quaz]

I've now added Hi-jacking thread to the infractions system which gives them 3 points, another one and they are gone.

cannot see that working...too many good posters will be banned as alot are hijacked with banter......

[Fawny]

We as fans need to ignore them and not respond, they will soon get bored and join in the real debate we are all having.

Absolutely right in theory, but people won't ignore them, I've seen it on other boards, if only it were that simple.

[The Merry Ploughboy]

merry Ploughboy,

I can deal with a difference of opinion.

I've just allowed to things to build up over a year. I used to think other sites that banned supporters were in the wrong, but to be fair its probably the best thing they ever done.

I read other teams sites and the slagging and banter is extreme, if you are so upset/fed up its your site so do as you please.Just be consistent and treat all posters the same and there is no comeback, simple really

[W12_Ranger]

I've now added Hi-jacking thread to the infractions system which gives them 3 points, another one and they are gone.

I am looking forward to this, looks like HA9's days are numbered.

[qblockpete]

You really know a QPR messageboard that is more extreme with arguments than this one?


Do me favour, pass me the link

[qblockpete]

to be fair


w12ranger,

Thats my decision, not yours

Myu, far too soft. You cannot give 3 points for hijacking a thread, it wouldn't work. just ban them

[MYU]

Absolutely right in theory, but people won't ignore them, I've seen it on other boards, if only it were that simple.

Points add up to bans.

http://www.wearetherangersboys.com/forum/showthread.php?t=49813

[The Merry Ploughboy]

other teams Pete is what i said.Define hi-jacking a thread as well because Funkys post on my Sousa thread was hi-jacking and you condoned it and this is where the inconsistencies lie,HA9 hijacks your thread for Gianni questions,again you do nothing

[Receed R]

what i find quite funny is the people that accuse me of hijacking

blimey lets use the gianni thread as a example, i made 1 post in it, was told it was not for that purpose and didnt post any further in that thread

to accuse me of hijacking threads is frankly laughable

anway this is the last i say on this matter and respect the site owners decision