-
-
I said No as well as I like to give people a chance but enough is enough with some.
We pay near £100 a month out of our pockets so that we can bring QPR fans closer together but some only care about themselves and come here not to talk about QPR.
I changed my mind to 'Yes' now and it's not fair on all the genuine members, If we were talking about banning lots of people then I guess it's fair enough, but only a handful says it all.Comment
-
erm mods are you going to act on the abuse directed towards me in vblocks post
quick too point the finger my way
cheersComment
-
Starting a thread about banning stirrers is an open invite for people to stir things up by bitching about each other.
Quite surreal.Comment
-
-
How ironic. make a comment about a fellow poster (jimmy the stirrer) knowing you will get a reaction, get one then try and stir trouble with the mods.
Quaz is doing a good job of moderating, keeps it simple and
nips things in the bud early without going over the top. No need for the digs at him just because he ain't sticking up for you
17 pages into this thread and still no clear definition of "stirrer". I took it that it ment posters who speak against paladini, particularly me and w12 , so I voted no. I now will be changing my vote to yes. You are the biggest stirrer (my version of a stirrer anyway) on this board by a country mile.
You regularly insult people who don't like paladini and when you get a
comment in your direction back, run off to the mods and undermime them.
When you were banned the debate was
much better and threads never erupted into slanging matches. You are the
main cause for that happening.
I can gaurantee that if you shared the same views on paladin as me, then you would not be welcome on this site and chances are you would of been banned indefinitly.
People debate whether this board is pro or anti paladini regularly, for me, the fact your still allowed to post on here and regularly cause rifts, shows that
your pro paladini views are welcomed regardlessLast edited by terry ball; 17-03-2010, 08:03 AM.Comment
-
Come on Mods either impose the bans or don't as this kind of thread is not doing the site any favours and only encourages the sniping from all sides.
For what its worth I don't believe any bans should be imposed just because some put over an alternative point of view as long as they are civil and not threatening or racist etc
Free speech and all that in my bookComment
-
We are dealing with it but every team member has to agree and HA9 & Paladinooo have had there warning, what they do now is upto them.
It's not really free speech Paul, this site is costing me & Pete quite a bit each month, although it's free to everyon else it's not for 2 of us.Comment
-
In regards to stirring I shall explain it, discussing the board is not called stirring however if there is a thread discussing something else and someone comes in and brings GP into it then that is within reason but not if not, think you will find that was happening quite a bit and needs to stop. (most of you will understand what I mean there)
Some members do not discuss or join in the banter but feel having digs at the site and mods is fine, they can go because we have no time for them.
We work as part of a team here and discuss matters before making the finial decision, it may take a little longer but it's a team decision.Comment
Comment