Would banning The Stirrers Benefit this Board??

[qblockpete]

I can see who the stirrers are and its almost time.

The club is moivng foward and I am about too very soon

[Quaz]

I can see who the stirrers are and its almost time.

The club is moivng foward and I am about too very soon

so just you deciding who then pete?

no I in team.

[WeAreQPR12]

pete go 4 it.

Terry and w12 would be a start.

They are starting to work off each other and they think there like the 2 ronnies, yet the jokes are all getting rather boring

[terry ball]

What is a stirrer in your opinion pete? My version of a stirrer would be
someone who tells lies or reveals secrets to cause trouble. Can't see
much of that going on to be honest

[Spencer]

The name of Pete's new board will be WATRB light.

[vblockranger]

so to get things straight....is it now a bannable offence to write anti-Paladini posts on this messageboard?? i am genuinely not sure what is meant by "stirrers". Paladini is a vastly unpopular character with the fans so i think it would be difficult and unfair to ban people for bad mouthing the numpty (i know theres a few on this MB who think the sun shines out of his backside :-) ) . So do we now all have to tow the party line?

[Quaz]

The name of Pete's new board will be WATRB light.

[qblockpete]

Terry ball and W12 ranger.

I would imagine you both love playing the role of prinicipal stirrers, but you are both becoming very boring and tiring.

Today, I have gone to a club meeting, lost money at work, come back home and instead of spending quality time with my other half, spent about an hour putting up a report. Dedicate my time in posting and keeping fans up to date with what went on and then I have two people like you just for the sake of it, posting c,rap.

You really are both not worth it. The only time w12 ranger posts anything decent and not confrontational, is when he believes he is about to be banned.

[qblockpete]

vblockranger

is that the best you have got?

we've run a poll 109-29 were against Gianni Paladini, gettng rid of 3-4 posters ain't gonna make a slightest bit of difference to my world,

[Quaz]

vblockranger

is that the best you have got?

we've run a poll 109-29 were against Gianni Paladini, gettng rid of 3-4 posters ain't gonna make a slightest bit of difference to my world,

what about the rest of the moderating team...do we get a say?

[Spencer]

so to get things straight....is it now a bannable offence to write anti-Paladini posts on this messageboard?? i am genuinely not sure what is meant by "stirrers". Paladini is a vastly unpopular character with the fans so i think it would be difficult and unfair to ban people for bad mouthing the numpty (i know theres a few on this MB who think the sun shines out of his backside :-) ) . So do we now all have to tow the party line?

A very good point.But at then end of the day....it,s Pete's Board.

[W12_Ranger]

so to get things straight....is it now a bannable offence to write anti-Paladini posts on this messageboard?? i am genuinely not sure what is meant by "stirrers". Paladini is a vastly unpopular character with the fans so i think it would be difficult and unfair to ban people for bad mouthing the numpty (i know theres a few on this MB who think the sun shines out of his backside :-) ) . So do we now all have to tow the party line?

Well it appears its Pete's ball and he decides who is allowed to play with it.

Adhering to the Forum Rules is not enough, specific posters are in affect stifling Pete's ability to run his MB the way he wants to. Therefore its would appear constructive, intelligent and balanced debate goes out the window for a more dumbed down version off the MB where posters hang on Pete's every word.

Angers me to think people spend a lot of time contributing to something only to get threatened with bans due to a difference of opinion.

[WeAreQPR12]

quaz you will always get a say but it always comes down to the owner of this board.
You can have an influence but that is as far as your responsibilty can go.

[Quaz]

quaz you will always get a say but it always comes down to the owner of this board.
You can have an influence but that is as far as your responsibilty can go.

which makes moderators pointless.

[theblackmafia.]

While this debate seems to be carrying on, may I just quote what Pete posted from another thread:

"Answer from Ishan

" Do you think that A manager like warnock would not have total control on which players come and go"

Answer from Amit

"have to say Gianni is someone we trust and if we did not value his input into the club he would not be here"

Now unless I have missed something glaringly obvious, why would you post the above if not to whip up a storm? To me you are stirring yet it's your site so it's ok? If I am wrong then please point out my error.