Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

January Transfer Rumours

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ConorQPR2000
    replied
    Originally posted by shaggy24
    I think we will lose willock up north his brothers up the road don't think we will get much for him he's done well under MC and his mojo back he's decent

    It's the dross left we struggle to move on kakay kelman need to move on

    Think the rebuild will be next window with out of contract players go barely any worth holding onto

    as for incoming I reckon we might do 3 loans max if we sell a couple with views to permanent
    I think Field, Armstrong, Dozzell are the only ones worth holding onto, the rest I think will be gone.

    Leave a comment:


  • shaggy24
    replied
    I think we will lose willock up north his brothers up the road don't think we will get much for him he's done well under MC and his mojo back he's decent

    It's the dross left we struggle to move on kakay kelman need to move on

    Think the rebuild will be next window with out of contract players go barely any worth holding onto

    as for incoming I reckon we might do 3 loans max if we sell a couple with views to permanent

    Leave a comment:


  • FurtiveFox
    replied
    Could see Sunderland trying to get Willock for next to nothing now Beale there. Would cost peanuts and if he did well would be a masterstroke, if not then nothing much risked.

    Leave a comment:


  • 3London
    replied
    lots of chat from Chair this week - how much he loves the club - how he owes the club - basically setting himself up for when the club try to sell him in January!

    hopefully he won't go but along with field he is our only realistic sellable asset at this stage - Willock would still be considered too much of a risk injury wise for most clubs.

    I think we need a replacement for Dozzell and another striker or 2!

    Leave a comment:


  • FurtiveFox
    replied
    Think only one I have seen is the non goal scoring striker from Fulham on loan.

    Rumour clubs might be back in for Chair but probably just paper talk at this stage.

    Leave a comment:


  • Canvey Ranger
    replied
    We are just over a week away from January are there any actual rumours about signings about????

    Leave a comment:


  • WeAreQPR12
    replied
    Ings won't happen that's just too unrealistic for our budget but Tim would be a very sensible signing as to where we're currently at

    Leave a comment:


  • Kingaustin
    replied
    Originally posted by WeAreQPR12
    Did Richards mention anything about Tim signing
    Why would he know ?
    its not from him btw and Southampton are now also in talks with Ings . Hopefully he don’t want to move out of London

    Leave a comment:


  • ConorQPR2000
    replied
    I suspect that we probably will have to shift some players out in January before we start seeing some incomings, I probably can see some of those who's contract is up in the summer being moved on to free up funds.

    Leave a comment:


  • topperharley
    replied
    The clubs ideas on the player signings need to align with this style of play. We need players comfortbale on the ball. JCS in hidnsight was a very good signing, as long as he stays fit. This window a loanee box to box midfielder and a loanee striker would be perfect. Personally i'd love to see Tim back in midfield, he'll be up to speed quickly and we know what he brings. Upfront, anyone really, as long as they aren't a lump, they need to be comfortable in possession and quick.

    Leave a comment:


  • WeAreQPR12
    replied
    Andre gray always played like his boots were far too big for him

    Leave a comment:


  • Dono77
    replied
    It's a shame Andre Gray signed for a Saudi club..him on a free right now would have been a shrewd bit of business. Arseh0le but the best finisher we have had after Austin. No one else jumps out. Ings is too injury prone.

    There's a lad at Wimbledon who is tearing it up in league 2. Hamadi. 21 years old. Plays upfront. 18 games. 10 goals. 5 assists. Worth a shot?

    Leave a comment:


  • SheepRanger
    replied
    So, five it is then.

    About time we sold the naming rights to the Loft..!

    Leave a comment:


  • LoftusRoadLad
    replied
    The following restrictions shall apply to Temporary Loan Transfers:

    A maximum of 5 Players registered on a Temporary Loan Transfer can be named in the Players listed on a Team Sheet for any individual match played under the auspices of The League. This maximum shall reduce to 4 Players where a Club names a Player on the team sheet who is registered on an Emergency Goalkeeper Loan;

    No Club may sign more than 4 Players on a Temporary Loan Transfer from another Club (or club) in any Season, of which no more than 2 Players may be over the age of 23. The deadline for determining a Player’s age in this respect shall be as at the 30 June prior to the Season in which the Temporary Loan Transfer is intended to take place. Any Temporary Loan Transfer which subsequently becomes a permanent transfer shall not count against a Club’s quota of such Temporary Loan Transfers for that Season; and

    Temporary Loan Transfers may include an option to acquire the Player’s registration by way of permanent transfer. Any such option must be exercised during the term of the Temporary Loan Transfer (including during a Closed Period).

    Leave a comment:


  • LoftusRoadLad
    replied
    Originally posted by SheepRanger
    Im not sure what the loan restrictions are but I was told last night that in theory we could bring in five loan players in Jan? Is that right?
    Deciding who to send out on loan to either develop their first-team potential or increase their future sell-on value has got even more difficult with new rules coming into effect.


    7 ?

    Leave a comment:

Working...