Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What clubs in Championship have so far spent

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • What clubs in Championship have so far spent

    Interesting topic on talk sport website re clubs in championship in the close season, was surprising that Derby fulham and a few others have spent nothing as well. Now i will be the first to admit they probably have better squads and in Derby changed manager etc.

    Is this a sign that clubs are starting to live within the FFP rules or one that like the general economy is feeling the pinch football clubs are starting to realise 50k wages per week are simply unsustainable.

    https://talksport.com/football/efl/5...ansfer-window/


  • #2
    Interesting, lots havent spent much if any...

    Brentford realistically the only club with Bristol City who are to spend having been in the champ for so long give the fact they've actually made a profit on players.

    The other clubs have been relegated so have parachute payments.

    Comment


    • #3
      According to this, Millwall paid 1.3m for Smith.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by HA2Ranger View Post
        According to this, Millwall paid 1.3m for Smith.
        Yeah right. and hull paid 400k for Ingram. I will take this article with a large pinch of salt

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by HA2Ranger View Post
          According to this, Millwall paid 1.3m for Smith.
          Sky has Luke Freeman as a "Player In" on Sky Sports News at 5 Mlllion....a net spend list would mean more I think (Sales v Purchases)

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Sleeping Giants View Post

            Sky has Luke Freeman as a "Player In" on Sky Sports News at 5 Mlllion....a net spend list would mean more I think (Sales v Purchases)
            100% agree. Meaningless without listing what these clubs got in.

            Comment


            • #7
              I can remember when I was younger how I so wanted QPR to spend 1m on a player like
              my mates teams seem to.
              Think I'm right was it Wegerle our first one mill player?
              But I am so proud to see us with just a 60k outlay great work.....#traditionalQPR

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by HA2Ranger View Post
                According to this, Millwall paid 1.3m for Smith.
                I believe it's stating Wall paid 1.3 for Bovardson & Smith combined

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by QPRDave View Post
                  I can remember when I was younger how I so wanted QPR to spend 1m on a player like
                  my mates teams seem to.
                  Think I'm right was it Wegerle our first one mill player?
                  But I am so proud to see us with just a 60k outlay great work.....#traditionalQPR
                  I have never been so excited and in a state of total disbelief when we signed Tony Curry. I was only young but have never had that feeling since. I was in a state of shock.....

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by qpr4life View Post
                    Interesting, lots havent spent much if any...

                    Brentford realistically the only club with Bristol City who are to spend having been in the champ for so long give the fact they've actually made a profit on players.

                    The other clubs have been relegated so have parachute payments.
                    Yep, FFP is having the desired effect (protecting the big clubs from competition by keeping smaller clubs "in their place").

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Actually regards my above question, probably was Ned Zelic QPR's first 1m signing ......wasn't it?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by QPRDave View Post
                        Actually regards my above question, probably was Ned Zelic QPR's first 1m signing ......wasn't it?
                        Osborn, Zelic and Hatley all came for 1M + in 95/96 with Hatley costing the most at just over 1.5M.
                        Like you, I was also excited at the prospect at QPR spending 1M, especially as it felt like a lifetime since Trevor Francis became the first 1M player.

                        There was also that great business with Clive Allen back in the 80s, when we made a few bob outta Palarse and the Gooners.
                        Minds Are Like Parachutes.
                        Work Best When Open...
                        @Nowt2SeeHere

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Bristol City have recruited well....could be a good season for them IMO

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Fraggy View Post

                            Osborn, Zelic and Hatley all came for 1M + in 95/96 with Hatley costing the most at just over 1.5M.
                            Like you, I was also excited at the prospect at QPR spending 1M, especially as it felt like a lifetime since Trevor Francis became the first 1M player.

                            There was also that great business with Clive Allen back in the 80s, when we made a few bob outta Palarse and the Gooners.
                            Allen was a homing striker weren't he, Oldest scam in the book

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              He sure was Dave.
                              wasn't he the first player we sold for 1M?
                              Minds Are Like Parachutes.
                              Work Best When Open...
                              @Nowt2SeeHere

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X