Bamford

[nasser95]

I'm not saying promotion is impossible, I'm saying it's very unlikely and it is, considering our own board think we're not gonna make it, hence selling our best player.

.....Anyways... Point is, Bamford is a decent player and would be a good signing if it's either a Perm or loan to perm agreement. Bringing him in on loan and sticking Polter or Washington on the bench and/or further keeping Chery out the side is fkin madness. IMO.

You could look at the sale that way. I look at it a bit differently. This sale is a way to facilitate the signing of players who will bring their all to maximise the chances of promotion. I actually do agree with you to a degree mate as if we get promoted and lose Bamford (assuming he was vital to that in the same way ravel was last time) then we're back to square one.

[Jeems]

You could look at the sale that way. I look at it a bit differently. This sale is a way to facilitate the signing of players who will bring their all to maximise the chances of promotion. I actually do agree with you to a degree mate as if we get promoted and lose Bamford (assuming he was vital to that in the same way ravel was last time) then we're back to square one.

If are in for him, we should include an option to buy if we go up. Or just buy him permanently. He's unlikely to make the grade at Chelsea, they play Costa on his own up top,have Falcao and Remy on the bench and are always linked to 30mil+ strikers.

[dogsrrs]

You could look at the sale that way. I look at it a bit differently. This sale is a way to facilitate the signing of players who will bring their all to maximise the chances of promotion. I actually do agree with you to a degree mate as if we get promoted and lose Bamford (assuming he was vital to that in the same way ravel was last time) then we're back to square one.

No not having that a player goes another comes the king is dead long live the king , if the management are doing their job properly you just move on , as I said in reply on an other thread the world was coming to an end when Rodney went then along came Stanley at fraction of what we got for Rodney

[bakes8]

You could look at the sale that way. I look at it a bit differently. This sale is a way to facilitate the signing of players who will bring their all to maximise the chances of promotion. I actually do agree with you to a degree mate as if we get promoted and lose Bamford (assuming he was vital to that in the same way ravel was last time) then we're back to square one.

I think we can agree to disagree on the first part and completely agree on the second mate.

[FACTS]

You could look at the sale that way. I look at it a bit differently. This sale is a way to facilitate the signing of players who will bring their all to maximise the chances of promotion. I actually do agree with you to a degree mate as if we get promoted and lose Bamford (assuming he was vital to that in the same way ravel was last time) then we're back to square one.

Agree, a successful loan spell for Bamford here, even if we don't get promotion, makes us more attractive to future potential loans from big clubs.

Having said that, I don't think Bamford with an option to buy is a wild suggestion. He didn't make the grade at Palace and they've got the worst bunch of CFs in the Premiership. Doubt it'll happen now we've got Washington but you never know.

[jmelanie]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-3406728/Patrick-Bamford-scores-twice-Chelsea-21s-Swansea-Bournemouth-striker.html

This article indicates he can only go on an emergency loan to a football league club.

[Kurt Bakholt]

No not having that a player goes another comes the king is dead long live the king , if the management are doing their job properly you just move on , as I said in reply on an other thread the world was coming to an end when Rodney went then along came Stanley at fraction of what we got for Rodney

Disagree unless we could wangle an 18 month deal?
If we go on a run where his goals/play are pivotal and Chelscum don't sell in the summer we start next season weakend by having to replace him, and bed a new striker in without a pre season.
Whatever division we start in next season, continuity is the key.

[dogsrrs]

Disagree unless we could wangle an 18 month deal?
If we go on a run where his goals/play are pivotal and Chelscum don't sell in the summer we start next season weakend by having to replace him, and bed a new striker in without a pre season.
Whatever division we start in next season, continuity is the key.

You dont get point the point his loan would end in may and if against the odds we got promoted , with Bamford in the squad and then he left I dont see how that should be a major step backwards you just move on to what comes around , if comes he comes if he doesn'tso what

[Kevin Mcleod]

Hope this is still on, when does he have to be signed by at the latest to be eligible to be able to feature in Saturdays game? Anyone know?

[3London]

Looks like Chelsea want him to go to a Premier league club.

[Kevin Mcleod]

It's a big fat NO to us.

[Ginger Ninja]

Dave Mc saying he want to go to a prem club, and Norwich are interested. No Bamford for us.

[3London]

i am sure the benches of premier league grounds are heated

[Shania]

Letīs go for Griffiths from Celtic or Gayle from Palace, if this one is off.

[Kevin Mcleod]

Hopefully that belgian kid will come and that game against chelsea wasn't a waste of time.