If there's no clause then I would be proper Levy-esque over this and accept no lower than 25million with sell on clauses etc
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Remy is at the Arsenal game
Collapse
X
-
-
That's what I said further up this thread....having an afternoon at the footy. People read too much into things.Comment
-
listening to the commentary on TalkSport it was hardly a classic. Interesting Matterface reckons the library was half full, another club with fickle fansI must away now, I can no longer tarry
This morning's tempest I have to cross
I must be guided without a stumble
Into the arms I love the mostComment
-
Comment
-
what? a player that we actually make some money on (even if there is a release clause) when we get rid of them...
thinking about it, remy is just about the only player we signed during the premier league era that will actually command a fee, rather than needing a pay-off.Comment
-
Comment
-
'Only a Ranger!' cried Gandalf. 'My dear Frodo, that is just what the Rangers are: the last remnant in the South of the great people, the Men of West London.' - Lord of the Rings, Book II, Chapter I - Many Meetings.Comment
-
Comment
-
Because he would never, ever have come to us in a million years without a load of clauses in his favour. Even so, we still make money on him. I dont begrudge him a move if he leaves on the cheap.Comment
....goes with his no-seeing glass eye balls!
Comment