Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Match Thread | QPR 1 Fulham 2
Collapse
X
-
Fulham have pacy forwards and playing Lynch against them is suicide. Should have had Furlong or Caulker there instead.Leave a comment:
-
-
Maybe, but if you are going to have Smith and Sylla on the pitch at the same time, then maybe the presence of wingers may help.
Bidwell is a complete waste of space going forward and Wsolek has not been the same player when playing as a wing back.
Can't believe the excuses being made for him.
Start Washington and Smith for the next couple of games along with two out and out wingers and a back 4 with two full backs and two centre backs.Leave a comment:
-
Ill put it in bullet points for simplicity imo
1. Bidwell or robinson on left side
2. Wzolek aint a wing back
3. Lynch is the biggest liability at the back forget furlong ned etc Lynch is shocking
4. no width for smith to get his head on crosses
5. seriously need a Proven CF or were in deep mess
6. Ollie may not be the answer but he's got to sort out strikers best 2 options from the off
7. some fans expectations may want play offs etc reality is we leak goals and dont score enough.Leave a comment:
-
Apart from CW, none of the established strikers can chase as much as Mackie. It does not make him an automatic choice. Maybe Wheeler will bring some of that quality and some inspiration as well. But I will not condemn Ollie because he plays Mackie. It's the way he wants to play the game, by pressing from the front. However, I agree that we needs a better quality player then Mackie. Freeman press a lot during games, however he is one hell of a player.Leave a comment:
-
-
-
Wheeler did ok when he came on. Would start him instead of Mackie next game.Leave a comment:
-
-
-
Appreciate that mate but I'm certain he doesn't instruct them to consistently miss the target or produce pathetic attempts straight at whatever keeper we're facing. Bidwell first half prime example. Put your fit through it for #### sake!!!!Leave a comment:
-
-
Leave a comment: