Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Match Thread | QPR 1 Fulham 2

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Tarbie
    replied
    Originally posted by Ginger Ninja
    Our best striker apparently.
    Sad thing is that he actually is mate. Really need to start digging down the back of the sofa for a striker in January. Our current crop just ain't good enough!

    Leave a comment:


  • West Acton
    replied
    Not convinced by baptiste know a few posters are but surely there are younger players available who can do what he can

    Leave a comment:


  • Bill
    replied
    Originally posted by Rangers77
    Leave. Mackie. Out. Simple. Play Washington and Smith, the least worse of a terrible front four. And play a f acking winger. Not sub him and play up the middle. As good as the midfield three are they can't run through a wall. Freeman looks like he could. How he wasn't w anky Sky MOTM is beyond me.
    Freeman good player but didnt track back for second goal jJohansen
    His man maybe just tired

    Leave a comment:


  • Tarbie
    replied
    Originally posted by Jimmy Floyd Rabbit
    Caulker - nut job / p!ss head

    Ned - useless

    Hall - non existent

    Can't say that makes me feel much better if I'm honest.
    Well I rate Hall as our best defender. And Perch was having a great season before he got injured. Agree on Ned, utter sack of poop and Caulker, washed up Alchie though!

    Leave a comment:


  • Bill
    replied
    Originally posted by Macca
    If IH is sacked LF and his cronies would have to go as well and get a decent manager in because any manager worth his salt will not come here if LF is still DOF.
    Be carefull what you wish for Timmy is waiting in the wings

    Leave a comment:


  • Rangers77
    replied
    Originally posted by qprjeff1882
    But even when he has the ball on the right wing he still never looks to threaten their left back. We had the exact same problem with Hoilett when he was here. Just something seems amiss with him.
    As a wing back there's no one behind him. If he loses the ball they breakaway. If Baptise covers he leaves a hole. That fact makes any winger nervous and likely to prioritise keeping possession.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rangers77
    replied
    Originally posted by Martinmalta
    If the club cannot afford to bring a 'Charlie Austin,' what else can Ollie do. The less money can be spent, the less quality we will have. So the scouting team will better do a good job come January. At least, since Ollie been here, we bought to the club two of our best current players for as little as 300k.
    Leave. Mackie. Out. Simple. Play Washington and Smith, the least worse of a terrible front four. And play a f acking winger. Not sub him and play up the middle. As good as the midfield three are they can't run through a wall. Freeman looks like he could. How he wasn't w anky Sky MOTM is beyond me.

    Leave a comment:


  • qprjeff1882
    replied
    Originally posted by stanistheman
    Agreed about spending some money on a forward, but should Pawel really be playing as a wing back when he is clearly much better as an attacking player?
    But even when he has the ball on the right wing he still never looks to threaten their left back. We had the exact same problem with Hoilett when he was here. Just something seems amiss with him.

    Leave a comment:


  • CroydonCaptainJack
    replied
    Originally posted by West Acton
    We have been gubbed in this fixture for years so in odd way it's nice to come away without being humiliated

    But for all the huff puff and effort there remain serious questions around some players. Lynch, Smith, Mackie, Bidwell, Yeni and Paarl etc

    Pawel as an example clearly has ability but if we're honest and please stop and think what does he actually deliver and contribute given his ability think we should expect more from him

    Two or three Lacey players away from being very decent side
    Yes agree re Pav. Surprised he didn't just swap himfor Wheeler. That was an exciting game though. Especially the end. We absolutely battered them.

    Leave a comment:


  • West Acton
    replied
    Originally posted by stanistheman
    Agreed about spending some money on a forward, but should Pawel really be playing as a wing back when he is clearly much better as an attacking player?
    This is spot on we're fitting players into side to suite formation instead of having system that suits what we have

    Leave a comment:


  • West Acton
    replied
    Originally posted by Martinmalta
    If the club cannot afford to bring a 'Charlie Austin,' what else can Ollie do. The less money can be spent, the less quality we will have. So the scouting team will better do a good job come January. At least, since Ollie been here, we bought to the club two of our best current players for as little as 300k.
    Do sheff Utd have charlie Austin

    Leave a comment:


  • stanistheman
    replied
    Originally posted by shaggy24
    If we dont spend cash up front in january were in serious shite midfields good enough but for me pawel was proper pony as a wing back fair enough we show battle when were behind now but we seriously lack any width or creativity
    Agreed about spending some money on a forward, but should Pawel really be playing as a wing back when he is clearly much better as an attacking player?

    Leave a comment:


  • West Acton
    replied
    Originally posted by acricketer
    Our defence looks like N. Korea's.......Flimsy
    At least North Korea are a threat

    Leave a comment:


  • qprjeff1882
    replied
    Originally posted by bakes8
    Freeman would have to go left side. Absolute beaut of a left foot pinging in crosses for Smith.
    No harm in trying it but we know it won't happen

    Leave a comment:


  • Timmy the Doc
    replied
    We did well in our first games when we put in early crosses.

    Leave a comment:

Working...