warnock square pegs round holes

[Rieger]

You're saying Warnock gets paid for playing Hill? Are you having a laugh. Biggest load of sh!te I've ever heard. Pretty sure that's not even legal. You're 'mate' has mugged you off.

Maybe true but if your salary is lower than other players. And the manager approaches you and says 'ill play you if i can take a cut of your appearance fee' and the player thinks 'great I get to make an appearance AND make money for myself I'll do it'. Is it illegal? Don't know. I might be made a mug of but im just passing on info I was given. When hill is played at silly times in important games I started to believe it. Man City and yesterday being prime examples.

[rangerforevereastcote]

Maybe true but if your salary is lower than other players. And the manager approaches you and says 'ill play you if i can take a cut of your appearance fee' and the player thinks 'great I get to make an appearance AND make money for myself I'll do it'. Is it illegal? Don't know. I might be made a mug of but im just passing on info I was given. When hill is played at silly times in important games I started to believe it. Man City and yesterday being prime examples.

now if that was true and you have posted it you have prob landed them in a load of shi t and it defo shldnt be posted on a public forum

[JonDoeman]

Classic WATRBs

[rangertillidiedan]

So what you're saying is Warnock is corrupt? Not sure if it's that specifically is illegal but will be against FA and certainly QPR rules. If you think Warnock has no integrity that's your opinion but for me it's not even worth considering.

I personally thought pushing Traore forward was a good move and would have liked Hill to start with Traore LW. Not sure why everyone thinks this is such a controversial and poor sub?

[rangerforevereastcote]

So what you're saying is Warnock is corrupt? Not sure if it's that specifically is illegal but will be against FA and certainly QPR rules. If you think Warnock has no integrity that's your opinion but for me it's not even worth considering.

I personally thought pushing Traore forward was a good move and would have liked Hill to start with Traore LW. Not sure why everyone thinks this is such a controversial and poor sub?

it isnt its a good move and i think long term traores position will be left wing
was our most creative player again yesterday

[Rieger]

So what you're saying is Warnock is corrupt? Not sure if it's that specifically is illegal but will be against FA and certainly QPR rules. If you think Warnock has no integrity that's your opinion but for me it's not even worth considering.

I personally thought pushing Traore forward was a good move and would have liked Hill to start with Traore LW. Not sure why everyone thinks this is such a controversial and poor sub?

What about hill coming on 3 minutes into extra time vs man city? Tactical? Injury? I like Warnock but its suspicious to me. It's not something that is provable. Just think it would be interesting to see if Hill will be subbed on time and time again when it might not make sense. In regards to the liverpool game...might have made sense there.

[QPRDave]

Who did Hill come on for v City?

[rangertillidiedan]

Came on in the 90th minute against City. Traore was knackered. Traore admits in interview on QPR player he has found it hard to last 90 until recently. That may be your answer.

If Warnock was doing this with Hill surely the club would pick up on it easily. It's all too obvious for me.

[SullivanQPR]

Unbelievable.

[QPRDave]

So came on like for like because Traore was knackered, who hit the bar late on with a header? don't suppose it was Clint?

[MattyRangers]

Unbelievable.

Only on WATRBs eh.

[Kirill]

So came on like for like because Traore was knackered, who hit the bar late on with a header? don't suppose it was Clint?

He has a contract clause, specified fee for every instance of hitting the bar, he splits it three ways, with Warnock and the bar.

[BennyBoyRs]

Leave it out. I'm not buying that pony.

Orr wouldn't have made it if Anton wasn't injured. Or are we looking at a conspiracy theory that his injury was staged as well, just so as Orr could get his run out?

Also, as said already, Hill's time at Rangers looked almost over. He's being picked on merit as he's been solid since returning. Something I never thought I'd be saying at the start of the season.

Are we really turning so far against Warnock that we'll believe s**t like this now?

[Ric-Roc]

Traore has had a thigh problem since before the City game & is / was being managed carefully.

Valid reason for Hill to come on imo.

[SullivanQPR]

Traore is off for the whole of january for the African Nations Cup.

If Warnock really wants to bump up Clint Hills appearances, then obviously he wont get a replacement in, or maybe he'll bring in Gary Borrowdale as cover for Clinton.

If we don't tonk Man Utd 3-0, I wonder what the next internet conspiracy theory will be?
Maybe Bradley Orr has kidnapped Neil Warnocks eyebrows, and wont hand them over until he plays 20 games.