I like Hogan's

[acricketer]

I never doubted him. He was a star first half of last season, became an International and fought his way back from serious injury to arguably even better form in the Prem. The man is a true professional.

[LoftusRoadLad]

Sorry I don't agree,championship standard player,while he trys hard always he is simply not good enough for this "new" QPR team

Not long ago we were saying the same with our Iceman !! None of us really know how they are gonna perform till they'v had a run out.

[Ric-Roc]

Good point.

[loftlag]

Not only do a lot have doubt's about Mackie, upto 3 weeks ago they also held doubts about HH me included still think the bubble will burst

[Factamondo]

if i were a gaylord focker jamie whould be my man!

[Del]

I think Hogan is a good player. He was class the beginning of last season when in the team, and what people seem to forget is that he is actually a very good finisher also when put through one on one.

As said he looked very good against Everton when he got on. People say he's only a CCC player, but the fact of the matter is there are many teams in this league that are barely better than CCC level anyway, and in them there will be many a weak FB.

[stainrodisalegend]

So let me get this straight. Because a team in the third team of English football have taken him on loan - after no one in the second tier expressed any desire to do so - and expressed a tentative interest in signing him permanently if he proves himself ("Its early days", to quote their manager) then he is good enough for us in the Premier League? I must be missing something...

I agree btw about Perone etc but we are essentially having a pointless debate about who is slightly less useless. Its what poor Neil had to work with at the time.

[MattyRangers]

if i were a gaylord focker jamie whould be my man!

[stainrodisalegend]

if i were a gaylord focker jamie whould be my man!

Thanks for clarifying that for us, facto. Now get your paws off those flashings - Bob is coming back on night patrol....

[haqpr1963]

So let me get this straight. Because a team in the third team of English football have taken him on loan - after no one in the second tier expressed any desire to do so - and expressed a tentative interest in signing him permanently if he proves himself ("Its early days", to quote their manager) then he is good enough for us in the Premier League? I must be missing something...

I agree btw about Perone etc but we are essentially having a pointless debate about who is slightly less useless. Its what poor Neil had to work with at the time.

I think you are missing the point.

Nothing to do with who he has joined, very much to do with the fact he should have been in the 25 ahead of the likes of Puncheon....

As you said, I think you are missing something.........

[MattyRangers]

I think you are missing the point.

Nothing to do with who he has joined, very much to do with the fact he should have been in the 25 ahead of the likes of Puncheon....

As you said, I think you are missing something.........

Is there an echo in here

[haqpr1963]

Is there an echo in here

Is there, is there, is there, is thereeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee?

[QPRDave]

Top class attitude.

No moaning, whinging & b!tching like others have done he just knuckles down & knows if he works his socks off he has a chance.

I think he should of been in the 25 personally. Came on at Everton & looked more than comfortable.

Totally agree Ric every word.

[qpr1882]

always rated hogan.

[dodge-stoke-r]

NW took a risk on Dyer and it backfired,a fit Dyer is a much better player than Hogan,as for The Southampton guy,he will be gone soon,hard to understand why Warnock brought him in on loan in the first place

Think it was a bit of a panic buy as NW wasn't sure of getting SWP. SWP signed and Puncheon turned up and it was a case of well "we asked him to sign so we had better let him sign".