My Take On The Game

[NW9_RANGER]

hogan did no better or worse than priskin. pete ur completely bonkers or blind as a bat

[qblockpete]

Scott,

Who played right midfield?

[NW9_RANGER]

Scott,

Who played right midfield?

like i said then, blind as a bat

[qblockoompah]

pete bugs me when u think u can label all r's fans in 1 statement. we are qpr and we need a boo-boy?????!!! absolute tosh. that mite be how u roll mate but dont carry on like u know all fans and u know how we all act and think, u do it all the time and it really winds me up. Ive never booed a qpr player but i will say when they are pony

[Ric-Roc]

Agree with all EXCEPT

Priskin is useless and its VERYYYYYY clear to see.

Hogan although didnt have a stormer,always tries to beat his man or whip balls in, much more effort than banana boots puts in.

[qblockpete]

Think you must have gone for a 4 mile run during the game

From goal kicks Priskin was used to win headers on the right, he did not play as a striker.

Tarrabt played behind Simpson and Priskin was played as a right midfileder when the ball was on the floor going forward. (cannot say right winger, as he definitely is not in the same mould or class as Routledge), but did a job.

If he was so bad, why did Warnock take Hogan off, if I am wrong?

[Hoopaman]

Pete do you get proper on it before a game and at half time??

I have a coffee and like to enjoy the game with a clear head. Your perception of it seems slightly different to everyone else.

[NW9_RANGER]

Think you must have gone for a 4 mile run during the game

From goal kicks Priskin was used to win headers on the right, he did not play as a striker.

Tarrabt played behind Simpson and Priskin was played as a right midfileder when the ball was on the floor going forward. (cannot say right winger, as he definitely is not in the same mould or class as Routledge), but did a job.

If he was so bad, why did Warnock take Hogan off, if I am wrong?

probably cos he worked his #### off, while mr lethargic just strolled round the pitch.

[Ric-Roc]

probably cos he worked his #### off, while mr lethargic just strolled round the pitch.

Exactly what I thought. We can't all be wrong.....can we?

[qblockoompah]

wouldnt bother trying scott. pete is above all and he chooses what he hears and sees. very selective memory mate

[qblockpete]

That automatically makes my judgement wrong.

Not being funny, but how can you side with Scott

He may be wrong

[NW9_RANGER]

Exactly what I thought. We can't all be wrong.....can we?

surely not. to be honest i sort of defended his first half performance against west brom but tonight for most of the game he was nothing but awful. it was kind of embarassing watching him trying to win headers etc. the bloke has no drive, he just sort of strolls around dont he lol

[qblockoompah]

no1 siding with scott pete. what u find so hard to understand is you are in the minority in believing priskin was good!!!!!

[qblockpete]

Heard it all now

Warnock didn't take Priskin because he didn't work as hard as other players.

Fair enough

[NW9_RANGER]

Heard it all now

Warnock didn't take Priskin because he didn't work as hard as other players.

Fair enough

oh so he took tarrabt off because?????? and he took simpson off because??????? errrrrrrrr what planet are u on pete?

*** oh i understand now... the reason simpson is brought off nearly every game is not because hes tired, but because hes ****.... cheers for clearing that up pete