Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Why didn’t we get warnock back

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • qprmarc
    Silver Seat
    • Mar 2009
    • 1942

    #1

    Why didn’t we get warnock back

    Always bothers me as to why we didn’t get him back permanently when we had him in caretaker charge for the stretch of five games, you could see the difference in the whole team morale , we where doing so poorly conceding 2 or 3 a game and he comes in and I believe we conceded 1 goal in the 5 games .
    middlesborough sat in 9th few points off the play offs just makes me wonder what could have been.
  • shaggy24
    Gold Seat
    • Apr 2016
    • 5800

    #2
    Originally posted by qprmarc
    Always bothers me as to why we didn’t get him back permanently when we had him in caretaker charge for the stretch of five games, you could see the difference in the whole team morale , we where doing so poorly conceding 2 or 3 a game and he comes in and I believe we conceded 1 goal in the 5 games .
    middlesborough sat in 9th few points off the play offs just makes me wonder what could have been.
    Les TF or he didn’t fancy it who knows but he’d struggle with this squad it’s poor very poor

    Comment

    • Jeffqpr
      Silver Seat
      • Jun 2015
      • 1833

      #3
      He’s history move on

      Comment

      • QPRDave
        The number 10
        • Mar 2009
        • 32072

        #4
        I might nip up and see if I can talk him into a return, only up be lanson

        Comment

        • Darkranger
          Silver Seat
          • Jan 2018
          • 1173

          #5
          Originally posted by Jeffqpr
          He’s history move on
          Yep true, but it is a valid point, that I have never managed to understand either.

          Comment

          • stanistheman
            Platinum Seat
            • Mar 2009
            • 11151

            #6
            Originally posted by qprmarc
            Always bothers me as to why we didn’t get him back permanently when we had him in caretaker charge for the stretch of five games, you could see the difference in the whole team morale , we where doing so poorly conceding 2 or 3 a game and he comes in and I believe we conceded 1 goal in the 5 games .
            middlesborough sat in 9th few points off the play offs just makes me wonder what could have been.
            I have been asking the same on here since before we appointed JFH.
            The answer I guess is that The DoF didn't want him or visa versa. I personally think we would have made the play offs that season with Warnock.

            However, he is history now and QPR need to take some action with MW even if it is only to tell him he has to change tactics and formation to suit the current squad .

            Comment

            • dave58
              Gold Seat
              • Jan 2010
              • 5285

              #7
              All about the so called DOF I’m afraid he’s the reason we didn’t have Warnock when he had a little spell Warnock questioned him and he didn’t like it.

              Comment

              • cross it Dave
                Silver Seat
                • Sep 2009
                • 3795

                #8
                Originally posted by dave58
                All about the so called DOF I’m afraid he’s the reason we didn’t have Warnock when he had a little spell Warnock questioned him and he didn’t like it.
                The sooner Ferdinand fu cks off the better, an utter waste of, I understand, £600,000 per year.
                I have supported Rangers for 55 seasons, since March 1969.

                Comment

                Working...