Hugill gone to Norwich

[knocker]

Official.

[Darkranger]

Wish him well, always gave 100%. We were never likely to get him on a permanent deal.

[Impey0711]

Not surprised

[3London]

Initial £2.6 million - rising to £5mill -we could have stretched to that. Maybe wages were always going to be an issue.

[qpr]

I don’t blame Qpr, didn’t make sense

Best of luck to Jordan

[SheepRanger]

Initial £2.6 million - rising to £5mill -we could have stretched to that. Maybe wages were always going to be an issue.

But the add ons wouldnt be realistic if we signed him - ie promotion. It wouldnt have been £2.6m up front for us.

[ConorQPR2000]

I wish Jordan all the best at Norwich, hes a good player and always gave 100%.

Can understand why we opted against going for Hugill, wages just far too high for us.

[shaggy24]

The new lad Dykes looks more mobile and is a bit bigger plus I think he's younger

[Jeffqpr]

He’s gone & forget him, let’s move on

[davieqpr]

Part of the add ons was for how many balls don't land up in the river.

[loftbalcony]

Best of luck to him, I'm not bothered we have not signed him.
Was OK and no more

[qprmarc]

Not too bothered, think my Nan could have grabbed 15 in 41 games up top with the service of eze and bright he was getting , far better options out there , think we’ve already got an improvement in dykes.

[SheepRanger]

Not too bothered, think my Nan could have grabbed 15 in 41 games up top with the service of eze and bright he was getting , far better options out there , think we’ve already got an improvement in dykes.

Wells didnt do the same after leaving us for Brizzle.

[Kit]

Wow what business by The Hammers, paid 10 million for Hugill and sell him for 2.6 possible rising to 5 ! After he had scored 15 League Goal for us. Makes our dealings last few years look decent

[bhujio]

But the add ons wouldnt be realistic if we signed him - ie promotion. It wouldnt have been £2.6m up front for us.

With us the add on would have been avoid relegation so it would still be valid