I am with Jimmy in that I have no issue with Fernandes earning a few quid but do not insult the fans with the P.R shite of it benefiting the club. Do what he has to do and stop using the name of Queens Park Rangers while doing it.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Oaklands update
Collapse
X
-
This is exactly right if it is Qpr it would go someway to helping with the ffp saga which should be our priorityOriginally posted by Stanley View PostAll depends if it's being carried out by QPR FC Holdings Ltd OR as an Arcelor-Mittal/AirAsia consortium (or whatever they decide to call themselves).
Comment
-
agree with thisOriginally posted by 1973 ranger View PostI am with Jimmy in that I have no issue with Fernandes earning a few quid but do not insult the fans with the P.R shite of it benefiting the club. Do what he has to do and stop using the name of Queens Park Rangers while doing it.
Comment
-
250 million spent and 60 million of that totally written off does not give you the right to mention the club you own and did your dough on.Originally posted by 1973 ranger View PostI am with Jimmy in that I have no issue with Fernandes earning a few quid but do not insult the fans with the P.R shite of it benefiting the club. Do what he has to do and stop using the name of Queens Park Rangers while doing it.
No rights at all.
Comment
-
He certainly is a bad ar se son of a bitchOriginally posted by 1973 ranger View PostI am with Jimmy in that I have no issue with Fernandes earning a few quid but do not insult the fans with the P.R shite of it benefiting the club. Do what he has to do and stop using the name of Queens Park Rangers while doing it.
Comment
-
Fernandes told TalkSport:
"We need to have a bigger stadium. But building a stadium in London is harder than starting an airline! I do see some light at the end of the tunnel. Old Oak is progressing, we'll use some of those profits from Old Oak to help us on the stadium, we've broken ground on 600 units, that's the first development.
It's special for us in terms of Old Oak, we're not property developers, we just want to make a bit of money to build a stadium, so we're quite keen on as much low cost housing as possible, that will benefit a lot of our fans and we'd like to create a lot of jobs around that area and use our stadium to create jobs, so it's kind of a different approach."
Read more: http://www.getwestlondon.co.uk/sport...s-new-13852899
Comment
-
His latest comments on another article about only building houses on old oak so as to pay for any future stadium is laughable.
He is pinning his hopes on those planning applications so as to cash in and recover some of that 250bil he has wasted.
I have no problem with him doing that, but I have a big problem when he lies about his reasons.
No way in hell will that clown get our club a new stadium.nsa/cia spy on this..............┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐
Comment
-
Do you really not see the contradiction in that sentence?Originally posted by Hitman34 View PostHis latest comments on another article about only building houses on old oak so as to pay for any future stadium is laughable.
He is pinning his hopes on those planning applications so as to cash in and recover some of that 250bil he has wasted.
I have no problem with him doing that, but I have a big problem when he lies about his reasons.
No way in hell will that clown get our club a new stadium.
And its million not billion
Comment

Comment