Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Oaklands update

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 1973 ranger
    Gold Seat
    • Aug 2012
    • 5990

    #91
    I am with Jimmy in that I have no issue with Fernandes earning a few quid but do not insult the fans with the P.R shite of it benefiting the club. Do what he has to do and stop using the name of Queens Park Rangers while doing it.

    Comment

    • Kevin Mcleod
      Referee
      • Aug 2013
      • 17322

      #92
      Latest.


      http://bit.ly/tflcoldoakcommon

      Comment

      • Bill
        Silver Seat
        • Dec 2013
        • 4490

        #93
        Originally posted by Stanley
        All depends if it's being carried out by QPR FC Holdings Ltd OR as an Arcelor-Mittal/AirAsia consortium (or whatever they decide to call themselves).
        This is exactly right if it is Qpr it would go someway to helping with the ffp saga which should be our priority

        Comment

        • Bill
          Silver Seat
          • Dec 2013
          • 4490

          #94
          Originally posted by Hitman34
          Good question.

          A shovel in the soil for the training ground and/or stadium.
          That made me laugh

          Comment

          • West Acton
            CCG
            • Dec 2009
            • 21475

            #95
            Very smart from owners choosing LC if they pull it off as still close enough to benefit from the OOC development and infrastructure improvements and land purchased in OOC can be used for something else

            Comment

            • 72bus
              Gold Seat
              • Mar 2011
              • 9520

              #96
              Originally posted by 1973 ranger
              I am with Jimmy in that I have no issue with Fernandes earning a few quid but do not insult the fans with the P.R shite of it benefiting the club. Do what he has to do and stop using the name of Queens Park Rangers while doing it.
              agree with this

              Comment

              • Kevin Mcleod
                Referee
                • Aug 2013
                • 17322

                #97
                Originally posted by 1973 ranger
                I am with Jimmy in that I have no issue with Fernandes earning a few quid but do not insult the fans with the P.R shite of it benefiting the club. Do what he has to do and stop using the name of Queens Park Rangers while doing it.
                250 million spent and 60 million of that totally written off does not give you the right to mention the club you own and did your dough on.
                No rights at all.

                Comment

                • Bill
                  Silver Seat
                  • Dec 2013
                  • 4490

                  #98
                  Originally posted by 1973 ranger
                  I am with Jimmy in that I have no issue with Fernandes earning a few quid but do not insult the fans with the P.R shite of it benefiting the club. Do what he has to do and stop using the name of Queens Park Rangers while doing it.
                  He certainly is a bad ar se son of a bitch

                  Comment

                  • Kevin Mcleod
                    Referee
                    • Aug 2013
                    • 17322

                    #99
                    Originally posted by Bill
                    He certainly is a bad ar se son of a bitch
                    Let him have it if you spot him today bill.
                    Proper give it to the tea leaf conman.

                    Comment

                    • Bill
                      Silver Seat
                      • Dec 2013
                      • 4490

                      #100
                      Originally posted by Kevin Mcleod
                      Let him have it if you spot him today bill.
                      Proper give it to the tea leaf conman.
                      From where im sitting i will have a really good sight of him if he is there

                      Comment

                      • Stanley
                        Guest
                        • Mar 2009
                        • 23693

                        #101
                        Fernandes told TalkSport:

                        "We need to have a bigger stadium. But building a stadium in London is harder than starting an airline! I do see some light at the end of the tunnel. Old Oak is progressing, we'll use some of those profits from Old Oak to help us on the stadium, we've broken ground on 600 units, that's the first development.

                        It's special for us in terms of Old Oak, we're not property developers, we just want to make a bit of money to build a stadium, so we're quite keen on as much low cost housing as possible, that will benefit a lot of our fans and we'd like to create a lot of jobs around that area and use our stadium to create jobs, so it's kind of a different approach."


                        Read more: http://www.getwestlondon.co.uk/sport...s-new-13852899

                        Comment

                        • Hitman34
                          Platinum Seat
                          • Jan 2012
                          • 13959

                          #102
                          His latest comments on another article about only building houses on old oak so as to pay for any future stadium is laughable.

                          He is pinning his hopes on those planning applications so as to cash in and recover some of that 250bil he has wasted.

                          I have no problem with him doing that, but I have a big problem when he lies about his reasons.

                          No way in hell will that clown get our club a new stadium.
                          nsa/cia spy on this..............┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐

                          Comment

                          • CroydonCaptainJack
                            Gold Seat
                            • Jan 2011
                            • 6141

                            #103
                            Originally posted by Hitman34
                            His latest comments on another article about only building houses on old oak so as to pay for any future stadium is laughable.

                            He is pinning his hopes on those planning applications so as to cash in and recover some of that 250bil he has wasted.

                            I have no problem with him doing that, but I have a big problem when he lies about his reasons.

                            No way in hell will that clown get our club a new stadium.
                            Do you really not see the contradiction in that sentence?
                            And its million not billion

                            Comment

                            • Hitman34
                              Platinum Seat
                              • Jan 2012
                              • 13959

                              #104
                              Originally posted by CroydonCaptainJack
                              Do you really not see the contradiction in that sentence?
                              And its million not billion


                              my bad 250mil i ment.

                              nsa/cia spy on this..............┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐

                              Comment

                              • brightonr
                                Banned
                                • Mar 2009
                                • 10922

                                #105
                                Originally posted by Hitman34


                                my bad 250mil i ment.

                                One way of avoiding his question, I suppose.

                                More of a nervous giggle than an answer.

                                Comment

                                Working...