New striker?

[brightonr]

Coloured?

She's Norwegian, so probably deserves the benefit of the doubt.

[Nick]

Coloured?

Yes, a slight off turquoise complexion with a hint of cherry red blush, why???

[upperloft]

Yes, a slight off turquoise complexion with a hint of cherry red blush, why???

What are you talking about?

[Kevin Mcleod]

Just seen on qpr till i die that Frazer Campbell is 4-1 to join us. Joe Ledley 8-1.

[Hubble]

She's Norwegian, so probably deserves the benefit of the doubt.

Norwegian Blue?

[Shania]

So " coloured" is borderline racism in England? Black is labelled a racist comment in Norway. It´s an neverending discussion actually.

[Shania]

Norwegian Blue?

Wow....oh well

[Hubble]

Wow....oh well

Monty Python connection Shania. Look it up.

[SteveQPR1975]

We have polter and washington

[brightonr]

So " coloured" is borderline racism in England? Black is labelled a racist comment in Norway. It´s an neverending discussion actually.

Over here Shania, it seems that the word "black" is the one to use. Always been a mystery to me why people get so worked up about a particular word, when it clearly isn't being used in a way intended to cause offence. Perhaps somebody can enlighten us as to the reasons.

[jmelanie]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/article/30999175/warning-why-using-the-term-coloured-is-offensive

[brightonr]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/articl...d-is-offensive

Thanks Mel.

Can't imagine referring to anybody as "dual heritage".

[Kevin Mcleod]

We have polter and washington

Manager has said he needs a back up for when he starts to play two up front in case one gets injured, the whole system has to be thought again.

[Nick]

Manager has said he needs a back up for when he starts to play two up front in case one gets injured, the whole system has to be thought again.

JFH come out and said he's going to play 2 up front??.. love that if true!!

[Shania]

Over here Shania, it seems that the word "black" is the one to use. Always been a mystery to me why people get so worked up about a particular word, when it clearly isn't being used in a way intended to cause offence. Perhaps somebody can enlighten us as to the reasons.

Point taken! This debate is surely(maybe) worth a thread in the general section.
On a second note: Thank you for the use of 1.st person