Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

what were the posituves and negatives of harry redknapp

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Nick
    Gold Seat
    • Oct 2013
    • 5593

    #46
    Originally posted by Kevin Mcleod
    If he wasnt responsible for the wins, then how could he of been for the losses? Come on bill mate.
    Pretty sure Redcrap signed a few of those players who got us to Wembley in the 1st place.....
    SIR LESLIE FERDINAND!!

    Comment

    • Bill
      Silver Seat
      • Dec 2013
      • 4490

      #47
      Originally posted by Kevin Mcleod
      If he wasnt responsible for the wins, then how could he of been for the losses? Come on bill mate.
      I would not #### on him if he was on fire in the street

      Comment

      • Bill
        Silver Seat
        • Dec 2013
        • 4490

        #48
        Originally posted by Nick
        Pretty sure Redcrap signed a few of those players who got us to Wembley in the 1st place.....
        So we should be grateful for that should we,as I said total fluke at Wembley and we got there by the skin of our teeth and you know it
        nothing to do with redcraps ability as a manager at all

        Comment

        • Kevin Mcleod
          Referee
          • Aug 2013
          • 17322

          #49
          Originally posted by Bill
          Don't Bill mate me he was crap and you know it,the football for the past two seasons has been diaboliocal and the damage he has done to this club is massive and yet so called fans like you
          still defend him
          I dont defend him, i defend the best day out of my life. A massive difference bill mate. Massive farking difference.

          Comment

          • Hertford Hoop
            W12 Seat
            • Mar 2009
            • 15998

            #50
            Originally posted by Ed the Ball
            Here's my take.....

            It seems obvious that Redknapp does not need to be working, I reckon he gets bored at home and needs to get out and be among "the lads". So negative #1 is that he did not really need to be in work.

            Redknapp's mobility was not good which affected his mood and his motivation, negative #2 he was not fit for the job.

            negative #3, he was far too cagey with his tactics, often going for a draw which nearly always backfired.

            Redknapp did not like getting out of his comfort zone, therefore going for people he already has worked with. negative #4 buying over aged familiar players

            negative #5 he was not honest enough to have called it a day long ago, ideally after Wembley.

            I can think of two positives, #1 he was a big name in football and could attract big name people to the club (not always a good thing)

            positive #2 he got us promoted at the first attempt
            Sums it up quite nicely for me
            I blew a lot on vodka and tonic, gambling and fags. Looking back, I think I overdid it on the tonic. - The one and only Stanley Bowles

            Comment

            • Nick
              Gold Seat
              • Oct 2013
              • 5593

              #51
              Originally posted by Bill
              So we should be grateful for that should we,as I said total fluke at Wembley and we got there by the skin of our teeth and you know it
              nothing to do with redcraps ability as a manager at all
              Well erm yes!!.... HE did get rid if the dross that was here and HE replaced then with players who got us to Wembley and won us the play-off final!!..... no matter how much you hate him or bitter you are you cant deny that. And yes Im grateful for that!
              SIR LESLIE FERDINAND!!

              Comment

              • stationcafe
                Bronze Seat
                • Feb 2014
                • 747

                #52
                Positives - we won promotion firs time round under him, though like others I wouldn't credit Arry with winning us promotion. Didn't get relegated to League 1.

                Negatives - wasted a lot of money, didn't buy the players our squad obviously needed, squeezed TF for every penny he could, tried to ostracise our most talented player, played horrible football, gave all his mates coaching jobs, didn't improve many/any of our youngsters, made us even more of a joke than we were under Hughes, has left an ageing and inept squad for whoever replaces him, didn't take responsibility when things went bad, had a losing mentality (every team we ever lost to were a great side that we could never dream of matching), and has quite possibly set us up for another relegation. On top of that we payed him a fortune for the privilege.

                Originally posted by Kevin Mcleod
                If he wasnt responsible for the wins, then how could he of been for the losses? Come on bill mate.
                Because he was our manager; that's his job. If I'm a teacher that doesn't teach my students but they still pass the test I shouldn't be taking credit, but if they fail I am partly responsible. At least that's how I see it.

                Never wanted him here and I'm glad he's gone, hopefully to never return.

                Comment

                • Bill
                  Silver Seat
                  • Dec 2013
                  • 4490

                  #53
                  Originally posted by Nick
                  Well erm yes!!.... HE did get rid if the dross that was here and HE replaced then with players who got us to Wembley and won us the play-off final!!..... no matter how much you hate him or bitter you are you cant deny that. And yes Im grateful for that!
                  He didn't win it the players did your ..........

                  Comment

                  • qprted
                    CCG
                    • May 2010
                    • 9639

                    #54
                    we

                    we all have good and bad things to say about him,if you look at gerry francis purchases devon white gary penrice ian holloway gary thomson dennis bailey these players did a job in the prem

                    but they all were free transfers or budget buys

                    les ferdinand had already been purchased as was clive wilson and david bardsley

                    darren peacock had been purchaesed and alan macdonad had come through the youth system

                    so the whole brilliant gerry francis team which finished 5th in the prem had been assembled for a very small amount of money

                    so yet another negative of harry redknapp was his inabillity to buy budget from our lower divisions
                    Click here to view my blog.

                    More...

                    Comment

                    • SteveQPR1975
                      Silver Seat
                      • Apr 2011
                      • 2762

                      #55
                      One of the worsed managers QPR have ever had
                      Also a crook
                      A man who never took any responcibilty for defeats
                      A man who took us up by luck
                      A man who loves spending
                      A man who lies
                      A man who praised the opposition
                      A man who criticized his own players
                      A man who liked negative football
                      A man who set a away record of 11 defeats in a row
                      A stubborn man
                      A can't
                      R's

                      Comment

                      • qprted
                        CCG
                        • May 2010
                        • 9639

                        #56
                        what

                        what is a cant
                        Click here to view my blog.

                        More...

                        Comment

                        • easthertsr
                          Silver Seat
                          • Feb 2010
                          • 1028

                          #57
                          The opposite of a can!

                          Comment

                          • qprted
                            CCG
                            • May 2010
                            • 9639

                            #58
                            you

                            you mean he is a hunt
                            Click here to view my blog.

                            More...

                            Comment

                            • Hertford Hoop
                              W12 Seat
                              • Mar 2009
                              • 15998

                              #59
                              Originally posted by qprted
                              what is a cant
                              http://www.thefreedictionary.com/cant
                              I blew a lot on vodka and tonic, gambling and fags. Looking back, I think I overdid it on the tonic. - The one and only Stanley Bowles

                              Comment

                              • Kevin Mcleod
                                Referee
                                • Aug 2013
                                • 17322

                                #60
                                Originally posted by Bill
                                He didn't win it the players did your ..........
                                He didnt lose any games , our players did.

                                Comment

                                Working...