Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Atkinson and Shawcross both a disgrace
Collapse
X
-
As you say TW, its hypothetical and therefore moot IMO.Stan....if, as in hypothetically. I know they don't do it. But my point still stands, wouldn't it be regarded as good defending IF they did a Shawcross. Pretty sure no one would complain, and even condone it if the boot was on the other foot. Just trying to see it from both sides.
But to follow the argument, IF they did it then I would not regard it as good defending at all. It's basically fouling your opponent and is a blight on our game. The sooner it's clamped down on the better and the only way thats going to happen is by the FA showing leadership and giving refs the backing to start awarding penalties.
If it happened outside the box they'd award free-kicks all day long, which tells you all you need to know.Comment
-
No it would not be regarded as good defending what a silly thing to even suggest its stupid and dangerous defending. If the ref does what he should have done and given a penalty everytime would you be saying the same thing??? Your only saying that as the ref never gave the correct decision and bottled itStan....if, as in hypothetically. I know they don't do it. But my point still stands, wouldn't it be regarded as good defending IF they did a Shawcross. Pretty sure no one would complain, and even condone it if the boot was on the other foot. Just trying to see it from both sides.
They were pens plain and simple not examples of good defendingComment
-
Comment
-
SIR LESLIE FERDINAND!!Comment
-
Yes it would've been bad refereeing, obviously. If in our favour and we didn't care, I wouldn't change the fact. Crouch had both hands on Rio's shoulders with arms at full length when he headed it down. It was as blatant a foul as you could ever see in such a situation and yet the ref did nothing.
As for letting Shawcross get away with his antics every corner it was a joke. Ref was woeful.Comment
-
Comment
-
Christ did no one see Rangers legend Alan McDonald defend? He'd have eaten Shawcross for dinner.Comment
-
..the bottom line is if we did what Shawcross did today, no one would be going on about it at all and slagging off our players for doing it. Fact. You can't argue against that surely?No it would not be regarded as good defending what a silly thing to even suggest its stupid and dangerous defending. If the ref does what he should have done and given a penalty everytime would you be saying the same thing??? Your only saying that as the ref never gave the correct decision and bottled it
They were pens plain and simple not examples of good defendingComment
-
Your talking nonesense and arguing for the sake of it. They were clear fouls and pens end of nothing to do with us getting away with it. Yiu said its good defending when it's clearly not good defending as your risking a pen
And your wrong we would moan and did when it was our player doing it. Do you not remember everyone saying Mbia was a walking penalty when done what shawcross did or you choosing to forget or ignore thatComment
-
For the record tw, if a r's player did that i would still admit it was a foul on caulker but would be over the moon he got away with it. Would also say it was foul for the goal if it was one of our men. But Rio has played about fifty million games and won every single trophy in the game but he doesnt moan or plead for the foul???? Wtf?Comment

Comment