Are Ferdinand and Caulker undroppable?

[Nick]

Isla... Caulker... Ned... Yun

Is a back 4 I'd like to see.

IMO Rio's in the same category as Hill and Dunne, 'NOT' in terms as what he brings to the team experience etc or even quality. But he is at an age where he's going to be left a bit heavy footed and not as sharp as others to respond to certain situations, which will cost us goals like it has done a few times now.

Yun, I think is still injured? So I think he'll play there when ready. Really can't get my head around Hill playing there, he's out of position and 100% shouldn't play there in that type of fixture. Also even though Traore looked good yesterday I still can't trust him in defence... I just can't!

I think/hope the future CB partnership is Caulker and Ned so I'd like to see that a lot more.

[Stanley]

thats cos they are the best two players we have in those two positions

In your opinion.

[West London is Rss]

Not sure what Rio has done to get dropped to be honest... The whole reason we have Caulker is because of Rio.

[Kevin Mcleod]

In your opinion.

Nope, the manager of queens park rangers opinion.

[Johnnykc]

I agree but it doesnt look that way so far - Harry has played Rio and Caulker for 90mins in all 4 games.

I would like to think than no one is 'undroppable'.......but HR must be commended for trying to build a little stability at the back and giving the partnership time to flourish.

Whether or not Rio/Caulker will work is another question.....

[Stanley]

Nope, the manager of queens park rangers opinion.

Exactly, and the opinion of who's is being fairly debated on a QPR fans' forum.

[West London is Rss]

Calm yourself down. Its called posing a question on a discussion forum, that's what it's all about. Either engage with the debate or dont, and move onto another thread you find more interesting. Quite simple really

Nah its called stirring it.
Its a ridiculous question.. if you have the right to pose a question on a discussion forum, I have the right to tell you if its a ridiculous one so don't tell me to move on if I don't like it.

[Rangers77]

Nope, the manager of queens park rangers opinion.

If that settled matters, Kev, we might as well shut the board down

[Shepherds Mush]

I'd like to see Ned given more of a chance but Rio and Caulker are our best pairing, no question. Few more games together against the teams that we are more capable to compete with and you'll see why.

As for undroppable....no-one should be undroppable.

[Kevin Mcleod]

My opinion on the question then and not the managers is ' if fit, then yes they are both undroppable'.

[Stanley]

Nah its called stirring it.

Nonsense. It's just posing a question and having a debate. If youre going to misinterpret it as stirring thats up to you and nothing anyone can do about that. However this thread was started to create fair debate and discussion and if youre now going to insist on derailing that then.....

[qprvoyager10]

In a couple of games when we are mid table this question wont be popping up again. The thread will be 'do we have one of the best centre back partnership in the league?'

[MattyRangers]

Nah its called stirring it.
Its a ridiculous question.. if you have the right to pose a question on a discussion forum, I have the right to tell you if its a ridiculous one so don't tell me to move on if I don't like it.

[Yousef]

I would drop rio and put ned in anyday but you know harry he wont drop his blue eyed boys

Agree with that.

[Yousef]

In a couple of games when we are mid table this question wont be popping up again. The thread will be 'do we have one of the best centre back partnership in the league?'

9 goals in 4 games!