Would you suggest we should all be satisfied with the first two performances?
All I want to see is a bit of progress. Making exactly the same mistakes as last time is not an indication that lessons were taken on board.
How long do you feel is a reasonable time scale to give him, in order to stop making glaringly obvious mistakes in terms of team selection and tactics?
The above is what you posted. I can only assume you were being serious. That's the trouble when the majority of posts are made in a sarcastic fashion, it's difficult to tell.
All I want to see is a bit of progress. Making exactly the same mistakes as last time is not an indication that lessons were taken on board.
How long do you feel is a reasonable time scale to give him, in order to stop making glaringly obvious mistakes in terms of team selection and tactics?
Originally posted by Kevin Mcleod
Comment