Marshy - Should he stay or should he go?

[qprted]

i

I DONT THINK YOU CAN ASSOCIATE FACTO WITH MARSHY


FACTO, MYSELF,VANHOOP WE COME UNDER A DIFFERANT CATEOGORY

insanity is exceptable

but marshy has stated that he is a chelsea fan on one of his threads can one of the mods find that
statement so the rest of you can understand that this is not acceptable

if marshy was trully a qpr fan then i wouldnt give a monkey about him but his statement has been made in one of his threads,why would he say that he was born in brentford ,but he was a chelsea fan........................

[Rieger]

I'd ban him or give him points. Problem is the precedent would be to ban facto too as he starts non-stop attention seeking bs threads constantly.

[vblockranger]

I think the mods have done the right thing here and its unfair to give them any stick about it. I have had my run ins with them over the years but moderation on this site has vastly improved over the last 6 months or so. Much more common sense used and this is a situation where they just cant please everybody so cut them some slack. They are looking after the majority of their members by putting it up to member vote.....how much fairer can they be? . It is going to irk some people (especially the liberal left wingers who love a minority :-) ) but thats always a good thing in my book :-)

[Rangers77]

It's not his opinions or his views, which are no more insightful or radical than anyone else's. He's obviously a knowlegeable Rangers fan. The trouble is he's rude and aggressive. And loud. Not just occasionally, but always. Being rude and aggressive is his default position. He picks and causes endless fights. All the time. He's the bully. He's not interested in discussions or exchanges of opinion. He can't, in spite of the appeals of the mods, converse. I've never had a run in with him, so I haven't a personal axe to grind, but to be in his virtual company is like being shouted at by a lunatic in the street. It's not a question of mob rule, but one of protecting this small, valued space. Marshy talks endlessly and rudely at us. He must have the mods tearing their hair out, which really isn't fair. They've better things to do with their time. His behavior only gets more obsessive and gets worse. Fella's been given every opportunity to mend his ways. Who here doesn't sigh when you see his name and avatar?? If the vote is for him to stay- and it's up to us- then I fear this will become We Are The Marshy Boys forum because his horrible anti social behavior, having been rewarded, will continue apace....

[Connell10]

With Marshy it certainly isnt the case of boring threads that have led to this situation.

oh i find his threads very boring because he always rattles on about the same thing, thats where he lets himself down , he just keeps repeating the same old thing and other posters keep biteing thats the part i find interesting!

[essex]

Stay, i quite like him, at least he has his own opinion instead of most of the boring twunts on here

[Norths]

i dont agree with banning people because they simple post boring threads, christ if that was the case id have been banned ages ago! he gets the crowd going and people always bite , so i say keep the slightly weird old foucker!

With Marshy it certainly isnt the case of boring threads that have led to this situation.

[Connell10]

i think he is a rangers fan, he wouldnt have used the handle marshy if he knows far to much stuff to be a troll imo!

[Connell10]

i dont agree with banning people because they simple post boring threads, christ if that was the case id have been banned ages ago! he gets the crowd going and people always bite , so i say keep the slightly weird old foucker!

[W12_Ranger]

Obvious QPR fan

[Felt]

Just stop him making threads.

[Stanley]

With all due respect to the Mods I have to agree with the good Doc! A popularity contest is no way to determine whether anyone should be banned, there are defined rules and if anyone doesn't play by them they pay the price regardless of their popularity, I hate the idea of a poll to determine anyone's fate!

I've voted here too. Unlike Davesviews, is there really any question over Marshy's credentials as a QPR fan? Accusations of being a Fulham or Chelsea fan are not unusual on here, I've been on the rough end of that myself.

I'm still not comfortable with mob rule, especially as I would be likely to lose a similar vote myself!

I stand by my point, if he's broken enough rules to be banned then apply the appropriate punishment. Otherwise advising people of the availability of the ignore function is a better option.

If only it were so simple. We have clear rules regarding trolling. The problem we have, as has previously been pointed out, it can be a very tricky task trying to discern if it is in fact trolling. I therefore agreed with another poster that putting it to a public vote would be a fairer way to make such a discernment. I am not comfortable with mob rule either but I am not sure I would describe it as that. But I did feel something had to be done soon as this was clearly an exceptional case which was getting pretty out of hand. And there'd be no chance of this ever happening to a long-term and generally well-respected poster such as yourself, Deepcut.

[gator]

Stay, polls like this are a disgrace.

With all due respect to the Mods I have to agree with the good Doc! A popularity contest is no way to determine whether anyone should be banned, there are defined rules and if anyone doesn't play by them they pay the price regardless of their popularity, I hate the idea of a poll to determine anyone's fate!

[Maggiejohns]

Send him To the moon

[DeepcutHoop]

I've voted here too. Unlike Davesviews, is there really any question over Marshy's credentials as a QPR fan? Accusations of being a Fulham or Chelsea fan are not unusual on here, I've been on the rough end of that myself.

I'm still not comfortable with mob rule, especially as I would be likely to lose a similar vote myself!

I stand by my point, if he's broken enough rules to be banned then apply the appropriate punishment. Otherwise advising people of the availability of the ignore function is a better option.