Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Should Ian Holloway Be Sacked?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dogsrrs
    Gold Seat
    • Mar 2013
    • 6671

    #106
    Lads FFS don't push for Holloway's sacking just now be carefully what you wish for , you know who's been working with the 1st team recently SUPER COACH , 10 to 1 he'll be appointed caretaker , bear with Holloway warts an all

    Comment

    • West Acton
      CCG
      • Dec 2009
      • 21475

      #107
      Originally posted by Rangers77
      Can't sack s hit manager in case the s hit owners and s hit DoF appoint another s hit manager.....

      If that's the best case that can be made for Ollie, God help us. And him.

      He's not a s hit manager, it's just that the players (he picks and sets up) are s hit, isn't much better.....

      In fairness I would rather curl a turd out on the touchline throw a peaky hat on top and tell it it’s in charge. Would be more effective then Holloway

      Comment

      • West Acton
        CCG
        • Dec 2009
        • 21475

        #108
        Originally posted by dogsrrs
        Stan FFS don't push for Holloway's sacking just now be carefully what you wish for , you know who's been working with the 1st team recently SUPER COACH , 10 to 1 he'll be appointed caretaker , for bear with Holloway warts an all
        would be step up

        Comment

        • 1973 ranger
          Gold Seat
          • Aug 2012
          • 5990

          #109
          Dare I say it I would rather Ramsay than Holloway as yesterday was it for me with him in charge.

          Comment

          • qprjeff1882
            Silver Seat
            • Aug 2009
            • 4080

            #110
            Originally posted by 1973 ranger
            Dare I say it I would rather Ramsay than Holloway as yesterday was it for me with him in charge.
            Me too. He was nowhere near as bad as Holloway considering his lack of first team management

            Comment

            • Hitman34
              Platinum Seat
              • Jan 2012
              • 13959

              #111
              Originally posted by qprjeff1882
              How do we know he hasn't tried but been blocked by TF. TF has said many times that he is behind IH and thinks he is doing a great job.
              Well, if he cannot convince those idiots then there is no farking hope for him.
              nsa/cia spy on this..............┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐

              Comment

              • dogsrrs
                Gold Seat
                • Mar 2013
                • 6671

                #112
                Behave yourselves last time we had Ramsey as caretaker he got a 3 year contract the next season farked that up got paid off then got reinstated

                Comment

                • Rangers77
                  Platinum Seat
                  • Aug 2012
                  • 11808

                  #113
                  Originally posted by Hitman34

                  Comment

                  • 1973 ranger
                    Gold Seat
                    • Aug 2012
                    • 5990

                    #114
                    Jeff. Not exactly the best judge is he Fernandes? His idea of a good job is to run sports teams into the ground.

                    Comment

                    • Hubble
                      Postmodernist
                      • Jan 2013
                      • 5616

                      #115
                      I chose sack at end of season, but to be honest, I want him sacked now. Really it's embarrassing having him in charge of our team. I'm going to the Fulham game in a few weeks and I'd like to look forward to us putting up a fight, to competing and who knows, even nicking it. But with this clueless chump in charge, I'm expecting us to get mullered. I've been sanguine for most of the season, but the Bristol game where we got beaten by a 10 man team, followed by yesterday's farce has done it for me. I've always said Holloway is a very limited manager with practically zero tactical nous, but I've allowed that to be tempered by an okay league position with a limited team on a limited budget. But when our team becomes a laughing stock then it's a different matter. How can we build long term when this idiot is in charge? I am very much for stability, but really this is instability, because we are not seeing players played in their best positions, we're not seeing meaningful progress and we're notr seeing players improve - quite the opposite. There are, dare I say it, some bright sparks amidst the gloom - like Smyth and Eze for example - but with the Bristolian gnome in charge they have little to aspire to.

                      It's a shame, because for a while I thought - despite my dislike of Holloway's idiotic self-promotion and huge ego - that he had instilled proper team spirit and fight among our players. But all that seems to have evaporated in the face of Holloway's inability to a) be consistent b) understand basic tactics and c) his ludicrous stubbornness in sticking to formations and players that just don't work. First it was Mackie, then it was Washington and all season long it's been 3 at the back without proper wing-backs. It's become an increasingly frustrating season and the thing is, it's all so unnecessary. So yeah, I'd like him to go now. ASAP. Sayonara, out the door, boom, goodbye.

                      Comment

                      • 1973 ranger
                        Gold Seat
                        • Aug 2012
                        • 5990

                        #116
                        Dogs. Would have Ramsay in charge till end of the season right now over Holloway.

                        Comment

                        • Hitman34
                          Platinum Seat
                          • Jan 2012
                          • 13959

                          #117
                          Originally posted by Rangers77
                          That would require energy, tbh.


                          think he was to gormless too realise we were against him.
                          Last edited by Hitman34; 25-02-2018, 07:05 PM.
                          nsa/cia spy on this..............┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐

                          Comment

                          • dogsrrs
                            Gold Seat
                            • Mar 2013
                            • 6671

                            #118
                            Originally posted by dogsrrs
                            Behave yourselves last time we had Ramsey as caretaker he got a 3 year contract the next season farked that up got paid off then got reinstated
                            And for those of short memory the football wasn't just aimless dross it was both under SOOPER COACH just see the season out

                            Comment

                            • dogsrrs
                              Gold Seat
                              • Mar 2013
                              • 6671

                              #119
                              Originally posted by 1973 ranger
                              Dogs. Would have Ramsay in charge till end of the season right now over Holloway.
                              Remember Ramsey didn't just fkuc up one season he fkuced up two seasons , sleep on it Buddy

                              Comment

                              • Hitman34
                                Platinum Seat
                                • Jan 2012
                                • 13959

                                #120
                                Originally posted by 1973 ranger
                                Dare I say it I would rather Ramsay than Holloway as yesterday was it for me with him in charge.
                                thats a bit like comparing tumours.
                                nsa/cia spy on this..............┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐

                                Comment

                                Working...