Bolton v QPR Match Thread

[Loneranger80]

QPR XI: Green; Simpson, Onuoha, Dunne, Hill; O’Neil, Barton, Henry, SWP; Austin, Johnson

[Loneranger80]

Subs: Murphy, Troare, Suk-Young, Jenas, Zamora, Hitchcock, Faurlin

[HertfordshireHoop]

Very strong side

[Norths]

Pretty much what i expected.

[Felt]

Two left backs on the bench.

[HertfordshireHoop]

No eagles for them! Ngog starts however, more good news

[QPR Richard]

Two left backs on the bench.

Yes, odd.

[QprSinceBirth]

my theory on hill at left back is he has played so well for 6months it would be wrong to drop him for dunne or a real left back.

[QPRWEBBIE]

Hill will get rinsed at LB, should of played Suk

[Kevin Mcleod]

Is there a better looking team and bench than that in this division? (Hill and Henry the only donkeys on paper.)
All we need is for them to prove it on the pitch week in week out, and we should go up even clearer than we did three years ago.

[MYU]

Very pleased to see AJ playing.

We need an early goal today and hope we get the result away from home.

Go get them U'Rssss!

[West Acton]

my theory on hill at left back is he has played so well for 6months it would be wrong to drop him for dunne or a real left back.

We should play the strongest side no room for sentiment if it potentially costs us points. If Hill cant start at CB is he one of the best left backs at the club I would argue not so should be on the bench

[LoftusRoadLad]

Hill will get rinsed at LB, should of played Suk

cannot beat experience. and we have enough going forward without having a wing back.

[THE CAT]

Hill will get rinsed at LB, should of played Suk

He did all right last week I thought against Carlos Edwards who is decent.

[Del]

Don't like the fact hill is playing just because he's captain. Traore and suk are better lb's yet he starts, it's stupid and I hope won't cost us!

Other than that, great side and glad aj fit.