if redknapp left

[shanns]

I would take di mattio like a shot.

[W12_Ranger]

Shows what you know about football

Di Matteo was nothing but a puppet, John Terry was running things and virtually picking the team when RDM was there.

When Di Matteo was at WBA it was also said he was carried by his backroom staff and didn't spend much time on the training pitch.

They have hardly been queuing around the block for him upto now

[Del]

Why on earth would you bring this up now?

[shanns]

I do beg your pardon 31 years of going to watch rangers seems to have scrambled my brain.

[dave58]

Mark Hughes HA HA how silly lets leave Harry where he is no more Chelscum rejects please

[W12_Ranger]

I do beg your pardon 31 years of going to watch rangers seems to have scrambled my brain.

Evidently

[loftlag]

I do beg your pardon 31 years of going to watch rangers seems to have scrambled my brain.

Well your'e not alone there the last 18 years of watching has driven my brain to be shot to pieces

[hal9thou]

Its not such a crazy question.

If we go down, and loose players - and remember there are quite few we need to loose anyway - then I'm not convinced Harry is a great development manager. I think he's very good at getting the best out of an extant situation but that isn't the same thing.

There is an argument to use relegation for a complete re-appraisal of how things are done at the club, ie trying to make a feeder system work. Thats not Harry's thing. No money in it. ;)

[californiahoop]

Its not such a crazy question.

If we go down, and loose players - and remember there are quite few we need to loose anyway - then I'm not convinced Harry is a great development manager. I think he's very good at getting the best out of an extant situation but that isn't the same thing.

There is an argument to use relegation for a complete re-appraisal of how things are done at the club, ie trying to make a feeder system work. Thats not Harry's thing. No money in it. ;)

Nail on head!

[Stedders]

Indeed. Actually I might potentially (not definitely) prefer not to have Harry in charge if we could get a genuinely bright, forward thinking manager who fits the mould of bringing young players through and playing good football.

[Ginger Ninja]

Indeed. Actually I might potentially (not definitely) prefer not to have Harry in charge if we could get a genuinely bright, forward thinking manager who fits the mould of bringing young players through and playing good football.

dougie freedman, he's an up and coming manager i actually quite like.

[QPRDave]

Its not such a crazy question.

If we go down, and loose players - and remember there are quite few we need to loose anyway - then I'm not convinced Harry is a great development manager. I think he's very good at getting the best out of an extant situation but that isn't the same thing.

There is an argument to use relegation for a complete re-appraisal of how things are done at the club, ie trying to make a feeder system work. Thats not Harry's thing. No money in it. ;)

Ol Harry's done bl**dy well for the last 30 years in this management game hasn't he? Some of our fans think he's clueless, you're convinced he's not a development manager...(whatever that is). Don't all managers develop players and teams? As for QPR becoming a feeder club......that's what we've had to do since we came into existence, i quite like beating teams like Newcastle to a French int striker, and hanging onto our players instead of selling as soon as bid comes in.

[Shepherds Mush]

So Harry Redknapp didnt develop Rio Ferdinand, Frank Lampard, Joe Cole, Jermaine Defoe ???!!

[qpr]

If Harry left i'd look at Pellegrini

[Kevster269]

If Harry leaves, I'm looking at Jack Daniels, lots of it!