Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Embarrassment

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • vblockranger
    • Mar 2009
    • 15218

    #91
    Originally posted by darrylgarvey
    Yeah thats true, I have accepted the irrational for 6 months on here, but I think the whisky has made me make the point tonight. What are you sons studying?
    I'm sipping some Jameson as we speak too :-) My boy is doing Multimedia Journalism and is about half way through. Cant believe i spawned a journalist .... just hope he doesnt end up at The Guardian! :-)

    Comment

    • Marshy
      • Sep 2012
      • 1958

      #92
      Originally posted by NortholtRanger
      Ive been critical of Harry recently but I think with what he has at his disposal he got last weeks selection pretty much spot on.
      No he didn't, it was a sh1te line-up, he should have put Park right-back to give some mode solidity to the defence that Bosingwa doesn't provide, Fabio left-back, Townsend on the right, and Tarbs up front with Remy. We would have easily won that game 3-1 or so. Instead, we fluked a 2-1.

      Comment

      • darrylgarvey
        Apprentice
        • Oct 2012
        • 108

        #93
        Originally posted by vblockranger
        I'm sipping some Jameson as we speak too :-) My boy is doing Multimedia Journalism and is about half way through. Cant believe i spawned a journalist .... just hope he doesnt end up at The Guardian! :-)
        Thats awesome, its good to get into. Lol he will probably end up sports writing cause of your QPR links....on another note...looking forward to the game tomorrow :D

        Comment

        • darrylgarvey
          Apprentice
          • Oct 2012
          • 108

          #94
          Originally posted by darrylgarvey
          Thats awesome, its good to get into. Lol he will probably end up sports writing cause of your QPR links....on another note...looking forward to the game tomorrow :D
          Jameson is the stuff of gods

          Comment

          • acricketer
            Platinum Seat
            • Mar 2009
            • 12068

            #95
            Originally posted by Marshy
            Yes. Sadly, I am not feeling too optimistic as I think Harry might go with last weekend's lineup.
            It's as if you take Harry's decisions as a personal insult and your condescending tone in everything you write is a credit to your blindness or malevolence, whichever. You do both brilliantly although I tend to err on the blindness side since you play the racism card in nearly every post.

            When I read your posts I am reminded of a steamroller that has no driver and slowly squashes everything in it's path. The positive about a steamroller is that it runs out of fuel. Regrettably, you run on methane.

            Comment

            • brightonr
              Banned
              • Mar 2009
              • 10922

              #96
              Welcome Daryl.

              You make your points well. Good to see intelligent, young and respectful posters.

              I am firmly in Northolt's camp when it comes to swearing. Not a great fan, sounds awful at times and far too much of it. Although, that is somewhat hypocritical of me, as I swear unintentionally too often and definitely intentionally at Ranger's games over the past couple of seasons.

              However, typing certain words beginning with F or C, on a messageboard at fellow Ranger's fans is beyond even me.

              Comment

              • darrylgarvey
                Apprentice
                • Oct 2012
                • 108

                #97
                Originally posted by brightonr
                Welcome Daryl.

                You make your points well. Good to see intelligent, young and respectful posters.

                I am firmly in Northolt's camp when it comes to swearing. Not a great fan, sounds awful at times and far too much of it. Although, that is somewhat hypocritical of me, as I swear unintentionally too often and definitely intentionally at Ranger's games over the past couple of seasons.

                However, typing certain words beginning with F or C, on a messageboard at fellow Ranger's fans is beyond even me.
                Cheers, lol at the game with some of the rubbish we have been watching is most definitely acceptable!

                Comment

                • Norths
                  CCG
                  • Jan 2011
                  • 13067

                  #98
                  Originally posted by Marshy
                  No he didn't, it was a sh1te line-up, he should have put Park right-back to give some mode solidity to the defence that Bosingwa doesn't provide, Fabio left-back, Townsend on the right, and Tarbs up front with Remy. We would have easily won that game 3-1 or so. Instead, we fluked a 2-1.
                  Its my opinion Marshy, you come across as hostile.

                  You big bully.

                  Besides that, I completely disagree and it is impossible for you to say we would have won 3-1 as fact.

                  I would much rather have a 'fluked' 2-1 win than a 'could have won 3-1 had we used these players win' because we could have quite easily lost 3-1.

                  Comment

                  • darrylgarvey
                    Apprentice
                    • Oct 2012
                    • 108

                    #99
                    Originally posted by NortholtRanger
                    Its my opinion Marshy, you come across as hostile.

                    You big bully.

                    Besides that, I completely disagree and it is impossible for you to say we would have won 3-1 as fact.

                    I would much rather have a 'fluked' 2-1 win than a 'could have won 3-1 had we used these players win' because we could have quite easily lost 3-1.
                    Very true

                    Comment

                    • Marshy
                      • Sep 2012
                      • 1958

                      #100
                      Originally posted by NortholtRanger
                      Its my opinion Marshy, you come across as hostile.

                      You big bully.

                      Besides that, I completely disagree and it is impossible for you to say we would have won 3-1 as fact.

                      I would much rather have a 'fluked' 2-1 win than a 'could have won 3-1 had we used these players win' because we could have quite easily lost 3-1.

                      Yes, nothing is certain, but in all likelihood we would have, because Townsend and Hoilett on the opposite wings would have been tearing their defence apart and with Tarbs always available to get the ball and link up with Remy, it had goals written all over it.

                      Comment

                      • darrylgarvey
                        Apprentice
                        • Oct 2012
                        • 108

                        #101
                        Originally posted by Marshy
                        Yes, nothing is certain, but in all likelihood we would have, because Townsend and Hoilett on the opposite wings would have been tearing their defence apart and with Tarbs always available to get the ball and link up with Remy, it had goals written all over it.
                        I get the thinking, but I dont get debating a teamsheet when we won the game...

                        Comment

                        • Norths
                          CCG
                          • Jan 2011
                          • 13067

                          #102
                          Originally posted by Marshy
                          Yes, nothing is certain, but in all likelihood we would have, because Townsend and Hoilett on the opposite wings would have been tearing their defence apart and with Tarbs always available to get the ball and link up with Remy, it had goals written all over it.
                          Again, points on the table, we got the win which I would rather have than 'in all likelihood'

                          We could just have easily have lost with the ineffective of late Taarabt in the team.

                          I felt the balance of team was just right and hope to see the same side tomorrow with maybe the exception of Granero

                          Comment

                          • Marshy
                            • Sep 2012
                            • 1958

                            #103
                            Originally posted by darrylgarvey
                            I get the thinking, but I dont get debating a teamsheet when we won the game...
                            I'm just worried Harry might choose the same 11, and this time, our luck will run out.

                            Comment

                            • Norths
                              CCG
                              • Jan 2011
                              • 13067

                              #104
                              Originally posted by Marshy
                              I'm just worried Harry might choose the same 11, and this time, our luck will run out.
                              I dont see how we got lucky last week.

                              Had southampton had a few cleared off the line, hit the bar/post etc then I might agree.

                              We restricted them well and took our chances, nothing lucky about that

                              Comment

                              • QprSinceBirth
                                Silver Seat
                                • Jan 2012
                                • 2566

                                #105
                                I told you to **** off marshy because it was your third thread talking nonsense. It's like you deliberately make a ton of threads to try and get a hostile reaction. When you do you play the bully card.

                                Comment

                                Working...