Originally posted by darrylgarvey
View Post
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Embarrassment
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by NortholtRanger View PostIve been critical of Harry recently but I think with what he has at his disposal he got last weeks selection pretty much spot on.
Comment
-
Originally posted by vblockranger View PostI'm sipping some Jameson as we speak too :-) My boy is doing Multimedia Journalism and is about half way through. Cant believe i spawned a journalist .... just hope he doesnt end up at The Guardian! :-)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Marshy View PostYes. Sadly, I am not feeling too optimistic as I think Harry might go with last weekend's lineup.
When I read your posts I am reminded of a steamroller that has no driver and slowly squashes everything in it's path. The positive about a steamroller is that it runs out of fuel. Regrettably, you run on methane.
Comment
-
Welcome Daryl.
You make your points well. Good to see intelligent, young and respectful posters.
I am firmly in Northolt's camp when it comes to swearing. Not a great fan, sounds awful at times and far too much of it. Although, that is somewhat hypocritical of me, as I swear unintentionally too often and definitely intentionally at Ranger's games over the past couple of seasons.
However, typing certain words beginning with F or C, on a messageboard at fellow Ranger's fans is beyond even me.
Comment
-
Originally posted by brightonr View PostWelcome Daryl.
You make your points well. Good to see intelligent, young and respectful posters.
I am firmly in Northolt's camp when it comes to swearing. Not a great fan, sounds awful at times and far too much of it. Although, that is somewhat hypocritical of me, as I swear unintentionally too often and definitely intentionally at Ranger's games over the past couple of seasons.
However, typing certain words beginning with F or C, on a messageboard at fellow Ranger's fans is beyond even me.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Marshy View PostNo he didn't, it was a sh1te line-up, he should have put Park right-back to give some mode solidity to the defence that Bosingwa doesn't provide, Fabio left-back, Townsend on the right, and Tarbs up front with Remy. We would have easily won that game 3-1 or so. Instead, we fluked a 2-1.
You big bully.
Besides that, I completely disagree and it is impossible for you to say we would have won 3-1 as fact.
I would much rather have a 'fluked' 2-1 win than a 'could have won 3-1 had we used these players win' because we could have quite easily lost 3-1.
Comment
-
Originally posted by NortholtRanger View PostIts my opinion Marshy, you come across as hostile.
You big bully.
Besides that, I completely disagree and it is impossible for you to say we would have won 3-1 as fact.
I would much rather have a 'fluked' 2-1 win than a 'could have won 3-1 had we used these players win' because we could have quite easily lost 3-1.
Comment
-
Originally posted by NortholtRanger View PostIts my opinion Marshy, you come across as hostile.
You big bully.
Besides that, I completely disagree and it is impossible for you to say we would have won 3-1 as fact.
I would much rather have a 'fluked' 2-1 win than a 'could have won 3-1 had we used these players win' because we could have quite easily lost 3-1.
Yes, nothing is certain, but in all likelihood we would have, because Townsend and Hoilett on the opposite wings would have been tearing their defence apart and with Tarbs always available to get the ball and link up with Remy, it had goals written all over it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Marshy View PostYes, nothing is certain, but in all likelihood we would have, because Townsend and Hoilett on the opposite wings would have been tearing their defence apart and with Tarbs always available to get the ball and link up with Remy, it had goals written all over it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Marshy View PostYes, nothing is certain, but in all likelihood we would have, because Townsend and Hoilett on the opposite wings would have been tearing their defence apart and with Tarbs always available to get the ball and link up with Remy, it had goals written all over it.
We could just have easily have lost with the ineffective of late Taarabt in the team.
I felt the balance of team was just right and hope to see the same side tomorrow with maybe the exception of Granero
Comment
-
Originally posted by Marshy View PostI'm just worried Harry might choose the same 11, and this time, our luck will run out.
Had southampton had a few cleared off the line, hit the bar/post etc then I might agree.
We restricted them well and took our chances, nothing lucky about that
Comment
Comment