Originally posted by terry ball
View Post
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Will keeping adel out the side...
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by terry ball View Post2 memorable moments in 27 games.. How prolific
Comment
-
Originally posted by terry ball View PostLike what?
Think about the role he is sometimes asked to play. If you use him as the sole out from a deep back line then of course he is going to find life difficult because you can predict that play. Harry has always found it hard to place him but there is a way forward.
Adel ended up as 9 at Chelsea and he troubled them from start to finish, if you play Mackie and Remy on either side he is the obvious candidate to go in the middle. 4-3-3 going forward playing to space instead of a static hold up merchant. I'm convinced that is our best bet given the task ahead. Harry's main problem is that although we've improved at the back, I still don't think he is 100% sure of how to set us up going forward and that is now the key issue.
In a nutshell he is far and away our most gifted player and the fact that the penny hasn't dropped despite the evidence is worrying.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hal9thou View PostMemories are short. His contribution was massive to the side who went up as champions, but ironically under Warnock he had far more freedom.
Think about the role he is sometimes asked to play. If you use him as the sole out from a deep back line then of course he is going to find life difficult because you can predict that play. Harry has always found it hard to place him but there is a way forward.
Adel ended up as 9 at Chelsea and he troubled them from start to finish, if you play Mackie and Remy on either side he is the obvious candidate to go in the middle. 4-3-3 going forward playing to space instead of a static hold up merchant. I'm convinced that is our best bet given the task ahead. Harry's main problem is that although we've improved at the back, I still don't think he is 100% sure of how to set us up going forward and that is now the key issue.
In a nutshell he is far and away our most gifted player and the fact that the penny hasn't dropped despite the evidence is worrying.You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hal9thou View PostMemories are short. His contribution was massive to the side who went up as champions, but ironically under Warnock he had far more freedom.
Think about the role he is sometimes asked to play. If you use him as the sole out from a deep back line then of course he is going to find life difficult because you can predict that play. Harry has always found it hard to place him but there is a way forward.
Adel ended up as 9 at Chelsea and he troubled them from start to finish, if you play Mackie and Remy on either side he is the obvious candidate to go in the middle. 4-3-3 going forward playing to space instead of a static hold up merchant. I'm convinced that is our best bet given the task ahead. Harry's main problem is that although we've improved at the back, I still don't think he is 100% sure of how to set us up going forward and that is now the key issue.
In a nutshell he is far and away our most gifted player and the fact that the penny hasn't dropped despite the evidence is worrying.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Stanley76 View PostWe also looked more like a 'team' without him, with everyone knowing their roles. We looked more solid and cohesive without him.
I think we may finally be on the verge of finding our winning combination of players and strategy. Our team's terrible performance this season has certainly not been due to lack of talent, we have many talented (and proven) players for most positions on the team, the problem is that for whatever reason these players have not been functioning as a working unit throughout the season. The problem has not yet been completely identified, nor its solution.
Taarabt is indeed a big part of the problem, because he was so central to the team that consistently failed. This is why I think it would be a good idea to not start him next week, perhaps not until we have actually found our winning formula. Once we know what combination and formation actually works, Taarabt could be put back into the starting lineup in a role that he could perform.
The same goes for Mackie, although he has less to offer than Taarabt in the talent department, he has been a regular fixture in the starting lineup that did not work. In my opinion he should be played as a sub, his workrate may prove important in some games.
Comment
Comment