Tweet
I take it a number 9 has changed then.......Cause Les Ferdinand he ain't
-
-
I take your point and you may well be right. But Harry played him as a lone striker v Chelsea, and he did keep coming deep for the ball as it's his natural game to look for it.Originally posted by hal9thou View PostComment
-
haha........ i had to mate....i did think long and hard beforehand...!Originally posted by theblackmafia. View PostComment
-
Sad but we're a better team without Tarbs. If we manage to survive it'll be because he was dropped for a team performance and not because he may produce one piece of magic.Comment
-
I bet you're always long and hard after thinking about Mackie!!Originally posted by QPRDave View PostComment
-
Thats a vicious rumour started by...............you actually!Comment
-
-
Toe in the water on jan 2nd and he still hasn't been for a dip since?Originally posted by hal9thou View PostComment
-
that's been the problem for us all along and why we've been easy to keep out. It depends on the back line you play against - Arsenal lost today because the line was high with not much speed and they were horribly vulnerable to balls played in behind. Against a deep back four then 9 has to link up more, but at least Adel can turn and that is a massive bonus.Originally posted by Stanley76 View Post
I'd be really sad to see him leave the club without properly trying this, the problem of course is that stakes are massive right now. I'd still try it again.Comment
-
It sounds like you're saying you'd like him played as a striker in a 4-4-2 because you don't see him as a hold up merchant...Originally posted by hal9thou View PostComment
-
He's got the aerial presence of a deep sea diver. No9 is not his positionOriginally posted by Stanley76 View PostComment
-
[QUOTE=terry ball;1043832]He's got the aerial presence of a deep sea diver. No9 is not his position[/QUOTE]
No i don't think soComment
Comment