Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Im going to put my head on the line
Collapse
X
-
-
Based on him not playing or ever going to play it is a waste of a place. That place could have gone to DJ Campbell where we are limited up front with options.Comment
-
Im not the one arguing about Hogan being in the 25 - You are. Im happy he is there.
Your the one who is meant to tell ME who is better off taking that place
- Someone WHO WILL PLAY
- Someone who will possibly earn his spot. (A mackie type...)Comment
-
ffs...Dj,Young,Bothroyd...how many more you want? no matter how many names your given tho you just wont have it so its a pointless argument. If you think Hogan will play and will earn his spot in the team then nothing no one says looks like to convince you otherwise. All about opinions. And yours seems to be that all is great and we have great players playing some great football.....deluded.Comment
-
I say that because he is taking the place of a player who has a realistic chance of making an appearance.
Young would have played at least 1 game by now had he been in the squad, He can play at left back which would have meant no place there for Hill against West Ham and West Brom when his lack of pace was exposed and cost QPR any points from games that could have been won.
Ephraim is also in the squad ahead of Campbell who would probably at least got to make an appearance from the bench.
When is Ephraim likely to be used?Comment
-
ffs...Dj,Young,Bothroyd...how many more you want? no matter how many names your given tho you just wont have it so its a pointless argument. If you think Hogan will play and will earn his spot in the team then nothing no one says looks like to convince you otherwise. All about opinions. And yours seems to be that all is great and we have great players playing some great football.....deluded.
Sorry was this you?Comment
-
What a stupid argument - 1 game!?I say that because he is taking the place of a player who has a realistic chance of making an appearance.
Young would have played at least 1 game by now had he been in the squad, He can play at left back which would have meant no place there for Hill against West Ham and West Brom when his lack of pace was exposed and cost QPR any points from games that could have been won.
Ephraim is also in the squad ahead of Campbell who would probably at least got to make an appearance from the bench.
When is Ephraim likely to be used?
Im sorry - I dont see the difference.
Id would rather a young player get a go than Luke Young.Comment
-
Perfectly put. As for your question "When will Ephraim be used?" He avoids that question as he has no answer to it!I say that because he is taking the place of a player who has a realistic chance of making an appearance.
Young would have played at least 1 game by now had he been in the squad, He can play at left back which would have meant no place there for Hill against West Ham and West Brom when his lack of pace was exposed and cost QPR any points from games that could have been won.
Ephraim is also in the squad ahead of Campbell who would probably at least got to make an appearance from the bench.
When is Ephraim likely to be used?Comment
-
Im not avoiding it Sammy.
Im saying Im pleased he is in the 25 - He may play he may not.
You are the guy who is arguing against it.
You are giving examples that are no better offComment
-
At least one game. And had we had a fit full back playing in the West Brom game we might well have won it.
And for the hundreth time he won't get a go as he won't play!! How hard is that to comprehend? I can also tell you are not a lawyer 9-5.Comment
-
That's what I was getting at.
I don't dislike him but he has so many better players in the squad who are likely to make it onto the pitch during the game. the squad has 25 places, Ephraim is taking one of these ahead of another defender i.e. Young who without shadow of a doubt would have played some part of a game so far this season or another striker Campbell.
Some may think that Ephraim can play as a striker, well obviously Hughes does not as he would surely have made it on as a sub by now.Comment
-
Look - I dont care what you say.
Luke Young wouldnt make the team - Plus a lot of people probably even you thought he was **** and the same goes for Bothroyd.
All im saying is im glad Hogan has a chance to play and may well get a chance. THAT IS ALL.
I dont need to agree with you or not
Also stop using silly little catch phrases.
Its madnessComment
-
Are you calling me Roy Walker?Look - I dont care what you say.
Luke Young wouldnt make the team - Plus a lot of people probably even you thought he was **** and the same goes for Bothroyd.
All im saying is im glad Hogan has a chance to play and may well get a chance. THAT IS ALL.
I dont need to agree with you or not
Also stop using silly little catch phrases.
Its madnessComment
-
but thats the point..you dont care what anyone says or what anybody else's opinions might be. You have a hard on for Hogan and thats that. So why go on about it if you refuse to listen? like arguing with a 5 year old. Mind you i just looked at your twitter link and you dont look much past 15 so probably best if we just agree to disagree and you go back to your legoLook - I dont care what you say.
Luke Young wouldnt make the team - Plus a lot of people probably even you thought he was **** and the same goes for Bothroyd.
All im saying is im glad Hogan has a chance to play and may well get a chance. THAT IS ALL.
I dont need to agree with you or not
Also stop using silly little catch phrases.
Its madness
BigChrisC 
Comment
-
What's so stupid?
Young is a better left back than Hill and would have played by now. Also a young 'homegrown' players don't count as part of the 25 man squad, so Hughes can select them anytime he chooses, but he does not seem to rate them.
As we have all pointed out to you (but you seem unable to accept) Ephraim is in the squad as a midfielder. He has Diakite, Granero, Park, Faurlin, Taarabt, Hoilett, SWP and Mackie who are all ahead of him in the pecking order for a game.
If Campbell had been selected for the squad, there is a realistic chance that who could play a part in games as QPR only have Zamora, Cisse as real strikers and perhaps Hoilett, Mackie and to a lesser extent Taarabt who can play as supporting strikers.Comment
Comment