No new faces, so who would you play tomorrow..........

[SANDERSON8]

I cant see Mark Hughes dropping Hill & Ferdinand (Nelson should have a go though), playing Adel (not good last week and when did he last have a good away game) and not starting without Zamora (That's the one good thing about last week, we will start we two strikers this week)

------------------ Green -----------------
- Boswinga - Ferdinand - Hill - Traore -
-- Mackie -- Diakite -- Park -- Hoilett --
----------------- Zamora ----------------
------------------ Cisse ------------------

I wouldn't mind seeing this team tomorrow, as Zamora could bring, Mackie, Diakite, Park and Hoilett in to play, but we cant leave Cisse on the bench as he is such a threat.

------------------ Green -----------------
- Boswinga - Ferdinand - Hill - Traore -
------------------ Derry ------------------
-- Mackie -- Diakite -- Park -- Hoilett --
----------------- Zamora ----------------

(Place your bets on who says first that Adel should play in the right instead of Mackie)

With respect i would play the deaf dumb and blind as opposed to NAAAAAAAAARWWWWICH

[Mellowhoop]

Paul you know Adel isn't allowed to be dropped don't you? WATRB under 21s would go into meltdown

[QPRDave]

I'd go with this.

That really doesn't look like Diakite

[MattyRangers]

Much the same players but getting something is more important than the performance
........................keeper.................... .
................Ferdinand Hill Onoura .........
Boswing........................................Tra ore
mackie.....Diakite .......Derry........Hoilet
.........................Zamora................... ..

Could put Nelson in place of Onoura ,I don't just know enough about him
Cisse Park Tarbs on splinter duty but all match winning subs

Cisse & Park on the bench?

[paulmason]

Paul you know Adel isn't allowed to be dropped don't you? WATRB under 21s would go into meltdown

It does appear to be that way, but hey ho, everyone has different opinions. I cant wait for Faurlin to come back and see who suggests first that Adel could play right/left back so he gets a game.................

[MattyRangers]

It does appear to be that way, but hey ho, everyone has different opinions. I cant wait for Faurlin to come back and see who suggests first that Adel could play right/left back so he gets a game.................

Tbf even I, a strong fan of Adel, would have him droped for tomorrow if Ale was fit to play.

On the subject of Ale, I believe he is playing tonight for the ressies - QPR official Twitter just wrote:

@alefaurlin has just produced outrageous moment of show-boating, plucking the ball out of the air and taking on a player with one touch!.

How we need that man back.

[paulmason]

I cant see Mark Hughes dropping Hill & Ferdinand (Nelson should have a go though), playing Adel (not good last week and when did he last have a good away game) and not starting without Zamora (That's the one good thing about last week, we will start we two strikers this week)

------------------ Green -----------------
- Boswinga - Ferdinand - Hill - Traore -
-- Mackie -- Diakite -- Park -- Hoilett --
----------------- Zamora ----------------
------------------ Cisse ------------------

Not a bad stab in the dark and Flabio must have a 'must play' clause in his contract.

[DeepcutHoop]

Not a bad stab in the dark and Flabio must have a 'must play' clause in his contract.

Or Hughes hasn't judged him on one match?

[SuperHoopNik]

Paulmason, you managed to get the line up almost fully correct. Even Zamora playing off Cisse which was totally bizarre by the way!

[paulmason]

Paulmason, you managed to get the line up almost fully correct. Even Zamora playing off Cisse which was totally bizarre by the way!

Not really Nik, that was a dead cert to happen. All you needed were eyes in your head and half a brain after the Swansea game to know the BZ was going to play with Cisse this week. Anyway, I would have your boyfriend on the left v Chelsea, as Hoilett was awful today and I would start with Boswinga and Onahura.

[DeepcutHoop]

Seems ridiculously harsh to drop Hoilett on the back of one indifferent performance, especially when he appeared our one bright spark (by comparison) the week before.

[paulmason]

Seems ridiculously harsh to drop Hoilett on the back of one indifferent performance, especially when he appeared our one bright spark (by comparison) the week before.

It seemed ridiculously harsh to a few on here to drop Adel, but it happened. Keep Adel in the bench then, as I dont think he will drop Mackie for him, especially when we will be chasing shadows for most of the game.

[bushcelt1]

should we rid of adel then paul cause every chance you slate him?

[paulmason]

should we rid of adel then paul cause every chance you slate him?

Yes, that would be nice and then there would not be sad fuvks griping because he don't play.

[bushcelt1]

Yes, that would be nice and then there would not be sad fuvks like you griping because he don't play.

find where i said it. prove that comment. or have you confused me with some else again. so people who rate the fella are sad ****s.?? the only person on this site who has a fixation with adel is you. the mention of him or ric or both in the same thread seems to attract your attention like no other. now go away and do a few underwater farts.