Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Can Barton be sacked for gross misconduct?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • westsussexranger
    Silver Seat
    • Mar 2009
    • 1317

    #1

    Can Barton be sacked for gross misconduct?

    now as im a student i have no knowledge about the world of work whatsoever but just been chatting to my old man and he says that we can sack arton on a gross misconduct charge?

    he said its the same as if (unless any of you lot box for a living) any of us give a colleague/client a right hook in the workplace you can get sacked on gross misconduct

    someone let express a more knowledgeable on this possiblilty please
    i supported qpr in the glory days when chris kiwomya and michael ngonge played up front
  • Factamondo
    You know when you've been factamondoed!
    • Mar 2009
    • 37198

    #2
    in theory yes............but this is qprworld!!!!!
    you know nothing john snow!!!!

    Comment

    • westsussexranger
      Silver Seat
      • Mar 2009
      • 1317

      #3
      also i can see how qpr can keep him. he was signed as a statement of intent a symbol of the new era
      i supported qpr in the glory days when chris kiwomya and michael ngonge played up front

      Comment

      • QPRDave
        The number 10
        • Mar 2009
        • 32060

        #4
        This is a footballers contract we're talking about

        Comment

        • winalotto
          Bronze Seat
          • Mar 2009
          • 5524

          #5
          Football is unique in a lot of ways, yes you could sack him for gross misconduct , but you'd have to pay off his contract ( not all) , more likely is put him on the transfer list, but who would stump up his weekly wage? In fact who would want him?

          Comment

          • Bluehoop
            Gold Seat
            • Mar 2009
            • 9258

            #6
            Originally posted by winalotto
            Football is unique in a lot of ways, yes you could sack him for gross misconduct , but you'd have to pay off his contract ( not all) , more likely is put him on the transfer list, but who would stump up his weekly wage? In fact who would want him?
            In the real world, sacking someone for gross misconduct does not require the employer to pay any money under the law of contract. As you say though, football is unique.
            #standuptocancer
            #inyourfacecancer

            Comment

            • The Leveller
              Bronze Seat
              • Apr 2011
              • 462

              #7
              In the world of work and in deed natural justice you will not be punished twice for the same offence, football or otherwise. Its called double jeopardy.

              So the charge will have to be something different, bringing the club into disrepute, breach of confidence or that with intent he tried by his actions to frustrate his contract of employment.

              I suspect that the club will fine him, perhaps on as many charges as possible as the club as defined by FA rules and as negotiated by the PFA have limited it to 2 weeks salary for each offence. Plus anger management course

              Sacking him would be an extreme outcome, far worse players in terms of length of suspension did not have their contracts terminated. Cantona (Kung Fu), Ferdinand ( Doping whereabouts) Kenny (Doping) and there are other examples.
              Populus fui meus nomen , tamen meus nomen est non meus nomen

              Comment

              • winalotto
                Bronze Seat
                • Mar 2009
                • 5524

                #8
                Originally posted by The Leveller
                In the world of work and in deed natural justice you will not be punished twice for the same offence, football or otherwise. Its called double jeopardy.

                So the charge will have to be something different, bringing the club into disrepute, breach of confidence or that with intent he tried by his actions to frustrate his contract of employment.

                I suspect that the club will fine him, perhaps on as many charges as possible as the club as defined by FA rules and as negotiated by the PFA have limited it to 2 weeks salary for each offence. Plus anger management course

                Sacking him would be an extreme outcome, far worse players in terms of length of suspension did not have their contracts terminated. Cantona (Kung Fu), Ferdinand ( Doping whereabouts) Kenny (Doping) and there are other examples.
                I agree sacking would be an extreme action, but you could list him in the summer for gross misconduct ..

                Comment

                • The Leveller
                  Bronze Seat
                  • Apr 2011
                  • 462

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Bluehoop
                  In the real world, sacking someone for gross misconduct does not require the employer to pay any money under the law of contract. As you say though, football is unique.
                  Not quite true, pay in lieu of notice, outstanding annual leave, yes but not rolling up the cost of remaining salary by length of contract
                  Populus fui meus nomen , tamen meus nomen est non meus nomen

                  Comment

                  • Bluehoop
                    Gold Seat
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 9258

                    #10
                    Originally posted by The Leveller
                    Not quite true, pay in lieu of notice, outstanding annual leave, yes but not rolling up the cost of remaining salary by length of contract
                    Sorry, I was trying to keep it simple for the masses as the OP was suggesting we would have to "pay up" his contract. On something like gross misconduct is there not an instant dismissal, no notice, point?
                    #standuptocancer
                    #inyourfacecancer

                    Comment

                    • The Leveller
                      Bronze Seat
                      • Apr 2011
                      • 462

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Bluehoop
                      Sorry, I was trying to keep it simple for the masses as the OP was suggesting we would have to "pay up" his contract. On something like gross misconduct is there not an instant dismissal, no notice, point?
                      Yes it is called summary dismissal and that is why it is called called pay in lieu of notice. You cant write away what is required in contractual law.
                      Populus fui meus nomen , tamen meus nomen est non meus nomen

                      Comment

                      • Bluehoop
                        Gold Seat
                        • Mar 2009
                        • 9258

                        #12
                        Originally posted by The Leveller
                        Yes it is called summary dismissal and that is why it is called called pay in lieu of notice. You cant write away what is required in contractual law.

                        Can you tell I don't read Chitty on contract before I go to bed at night
                        #standuptocancer
                        #inyourfacecancer

                        Comment

                        • The Leveller
                          Bronze Seat
                          • Apr 2011
                          • 462

                          #13
                          You are not alone, a few people make a living out of it
                          Populus fui meus nomen , tamen meus nomen est non meus nomen

                          Comment

                          • kron-1664
                            Silver Seat
                            • May 2009
                            • 4403

                            #14
                            Im sure he wont play for QPR again. The image that his outburst creates would not go down well to the South East Asian prospective followers. If they sacked him for Gross misconduct im sure he would create a legal case, cue the Mittal and Fernandes retained legal team. Could go on for years.

                            Comment

                            Working...