Cisse v Chalea

[QPRDave]

Think id go with Traore on the left.

Agree traore for adel

[W12_Ranger]

Why change the team or the formation?

think if we sit back at SB they will pick us off

we need to take the game to them

buzsaky is a real weak link when he starts

Traore i agree would be an ideal replacement for adel, cisse has start with BZ...derry should make way

i'm no fan of swp but he owes us a performance and his pace could unsettle a weary chelsea defence

[rangertillidiedan]

I would get Cisse in as long as he defends like Adel did yesterday. After all, it may not be his natural role but he owes us some hard work. Breaking with pace down the left on the counter attack. Other option traore in and Cisse off the bench second half if needed.

Tell your ma, your ma, to put the champagne on ice...

[QPR_NW10]

Adel away from home, especially at big ground, hasn't really produced. i know he's been so much better since he got dropped around december but i personally think it's been a *tiny* blessing in disguise.

[W12_Ranger]

Adel away from home, especially at big ground, hasn't really produced. i know he's been so much better since he got dropped around december but i personally think it's been a *tiny* blessing in disguise.

agreed just was saying this to someone

[QPRDave]

think if we sit back at SB they will pick us off

we need to take the game to them

buzsaky is a real weak link when he starts

Traore i agree would be an ideal replacement for adel, cisse has start with BZ...derry should make way

i'm no fan of swp but he owes us a performance and his pace could unsettle a weary chelsea defence

Ok mate fair points so you would go 442 at the bridge?

[EYR]

Adel away from home, especially at big ground, hasn't really produced. i know he's been so much better since he got dropped around december but i personally think it's been a *tiny* blessing in disguise.

Yes Hughes didnt seem to fussed by the red card.

[W12_Ranger]

Ok mate fair points so you would go 442 at the bridge?

yeah deffo and 4-5-1 against Stoke...we have nothing to lose at the bridge.

lets just go for it, they won't be expecting it

[QPRDave]

Yeah maybe you're right W12, and i'll say this, Cisse i reckon will be champing at the bit,
so as long as he channels it in the right way, and don't get sent off, he'll be a real handfull.

[LoftusRoadLad]

yeah deffo and 4-5-1 against Stoke...we have nothing to lose at the bridge.

lets just go for it, they won't be expecting it

We cannot just go for it. We have to follow what we have been doing to Spuds. Sit back and hit em on the break, that seems to be the fashion lately with weaker teams against bettter teams and its working i.e the girls down the road v Barca, Arsy v Wiggs, Barca v Real and a few others are doing the same. Cisse we need for Stoke.

[MattyRangers]

Wouldnt mind this line up for Chelski game:

Kenny
Onouha Anton Hill Taiwo
Mackie Barton Diakite Traore
Bobby Cisse

Take the game to them, dont sit back and hope, really attack them and see how they handle it / react.

[maidstone_hoop]

I'm a firm believe in not changing a winning team do for me I'd set up exactly the same way as we did against spurs and would bring in Traore or cisse on the left for adel!
Apply same game plan knowing chelse will have more of the ball and we got them on the counter!

[SuperHoopNik]

Same starting 11 vs Spurs. Apart from DJ replacing Adel, and Cisse to come on off the bench in the second half. Sorted!

[Radek the Great]

In Hughes I trust

[SuperHoopNik]

-----------Kenny----------
Onouha-Ferdinand-Hill-Taiwo
-------Diakite-Derry-------
--Mackie-Barton-Campbell
----------DC/BZ----------