Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

since hughes took over

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • qpr4eva89
    Bronze Seat
    • Mar 2009
    • 645

    #1

    since hughes took over

    i think hes made us worse ,he seems to have not told the players how to challenge for a 2nd ball and how to make 3 passes in a row without giving it to our back line joke of a manager jog on !!!!!!!!!!!

    like i said before warnock got sacked hes useless and won **** all !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • Factamondo
    You know when you've been factamondoed!
    • Mar 2009
    • 37198

    #2
    im unconvinced wirewool head has the minerals for the job!
    you know nothing john snow!!!!

    Comment

    • EYR
      Gold Seat
      • Mar 2009
      • 5470

      #3
      Im exhausted from it all just relegate us so we can get shot of these overpaid *****s.

      Comment

      • qpr4eva89
        Bronze Seat
        • Mar 2009
        • 645

        #4
        even though we came back at liverpool their 2 goals nobody challenged for the second ball and the same happened 4 their goals yesterday no challenges for the second ball , i give up !

        Comment

        • BUSHRANGER1982
          Gold Seat
          • Mar 2009
          • 5666

          #5
          Nope, I've read, and re-read your post several times now, and I give up.

          What, if any, is the difference between Rangers under Warnock, and Rangers under Hughes?

          How anyone can say that one is better than the other, is beyond me.

          That shower of shyte we have playing for us, would give Sir Alex Ferguson more problems now, than he's had in the last 20 years overall.

          Comment

          • qpr4eva89
            Bronze Seat
            • Mar 2009
            • 645

            #6
            Originally posted by BUSHRANGER1982
            Nope, I've read, and re-read your post several times now, and I give up.

            What, if any, is the difference between Rangers under Warnock, and Rangers under Hughes?

            How anyone can say that one is better than the other, is beyond me.

            That shower of shyte we have playing for us, would give Sir Alex Ferguson more problems now, than he's had in the last 20 years overall.
            the difference is hughes got the money 2 spend in january and warnock didnt , id rather have a manager jumping up and down on the touchline whos won 7 promotions than someone whos won f all and done f all as a manager standing on the sidelines with his arms folded

            Comment

            • lymehoop
              Gold Seat
              • Mar 2009
              • 7380

              #7
              you have to be a soddin messiah to turn these donkeys into thoroughbreds, you can't put all the blame on sparkless
              I must away now, I can no longer tarry
              This morning's tempest I have to cross
              I must be guided without a stumble
              Into the arms I love the most

              Comment

              • qpr4eva89
                Bronze Seat
                • Mar 2009
                • 645

                #8
                Originally posted by lymehoop
                you have to be a soddin messiah to turn these donkeys into thoroughbreds, you can't put all the blame on sparkless
                he brought most of them in

                Comment

                • Shania
                  C Club
                  • Apr 2010
                  • 23696

                  #9
                  Originally posted by qpr4eva89
                  i think hes made us worse ,he seems to have not told the players how to challenge for a 2nd ball and how to make 3 passes in a row without giving it to our back line joke of a manager jog on !!!!!!!!!!!
                  Originally posted by qpr4eva89

                  like i said before warnock got sacked hes useless and won **** all !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

                  Thatīs true.
                  QPR
                  Best team in the world
                  Sort of

                  Comment

                  • Kit
                    Silver Seat
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 3747

                    #10
                    Originally posted by BUSHRANGER1982
                    Nope, I've read, and re-read your post several times now, and I give up.

                    What, if any, is the difference between Rangers under Warnock, and Rangers under Hughes?

                    How anyone can say that one is better than the other, is beyond me.

                    That shower of shyte we have playing for us, would give Sir Alex Ferguson more problems now, than he's had in the last 20 years overall.
                    Totally agree, the players are letting MH and TF down badly and also let NW down as well. Great player as Cisse is his indiscipline has completely wrecked Hughes's plans, as he has shown us what he can do, but missing from 7 games out of 14 is totally inexcusable.

                    Comment

                    • W12_Ranger
                      Platinum Seat
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 11447

                      #11
                      The rot had set in under Warnock, I really don't understand why so many fail to see this.

                      Comment

                      • Shania
                        C Club
                        • Apr 2010
                        • 23696

                        #12
                        Originally posted by qpr4eva89
                        even though we came back at liverpool their 2 goals nobody challenged for the second ball and the same happened 4 their goals yesterday no challenges for the second ball , i give up !
                        Thatīs true!!

                        Itīs close to being funny now actually.
                        QPR
                        Best team in the world
                        Sort of

                        Comment

                        • vblockranger
                          • Mar 2009
                          • 15218

                          #13
                          Originally posted by W12_Ranger
                          The rot had set in under Warnock, I really don't understand why so many fail to see this.

                          Comment

                          • QPRDave
                            The number 10
                            • Mar 2009
                            • 32068

                            #14
                            Originally posted by W12_Ranger
                            The rot had set in under Warnock, I really don't understand why so many fail to see this.
                            There's no arguing with that W12 i'll admit, but we were told NW had lost the dressing room, so why now MH is here are the results as bad.
                            We have had a new influx of players that should have lifted the others,with the calibre we brought in, so why?

                            Comment

                            • W12_Ranger
                              Platinum Seat
                              • Mar 2009
                              • 11447

                              #15
                              Originally posted by QPRDave
                              There's no arguing with that W12 i'll admit, but we were told NW had lost the dressing room, so why now MH is here are the results as bad.
                              We have had a new influx of players that should have lifted the others,with the calibre we brought in, so why?
                              Poor management on MH's part, he failed to sign players to galvanise the dressing room. He also signed players who were a risk, he should have made good steady PL signings, the sort which would steady a ship not sink it.

                              Comment

                              Working...