Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Barton Hypercritical?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bigdave
    Gold Seat
    • Apr 2009
    • 5109

    #1

    Barton Hypercritical?

    Sorry if already brought up but someone at work today commented that Barton slating Johnson for getting him sent off was the pot calling the kettle black after he did the same after a coming together with Gervinho in the Newcastle Arsenal game at the start of the season. Got to be honest i completely forgot about that and he does have a point.
  • W12_Ranger
    Platinum Seat
    • Mar 2009
    • 11447

    #2
    bang on

    Comment

    • QPR Richard
      Gold Seat
      • Sep 2011
      • 6489

      #3
      Personally I don't give a stuff about what he did when he played for the Geordies. All I know is that a disgraceful decision by the ref and the FA has cost us big time while he's in a hooped shirt.
      Supporting QPR isn't just about a football team. It's about roots and identity.

      Comment

      • W12_Ranger
        Platinum Seat
        • Mar 2009
        • 11447

        #4
        Originally posted by QPR Richard
        Personally I don't give a stuff about what he did when he played for the Geordies. All I know is that a disgraceful decision by the ref and the FA has cost us big time while he's in a hooped shirt.
        because it doesn't fit in with your agenda

        Comment

        • mork
          Bronze Seat
          • Aug 2009
          • 634

          #5
          It's true but still buggers us up. Also he was head butted but made a meal of it but on Monday it was not a head butt.

          Comment

          • Bigdave
            Gold Seat
            • Apr 2009
            • 5109

            #6
            I agree its f cuked us but some might say what goes around comes around.

            I still dont quite understand how the ref sent him off when he never saw anything and the lino never flagged but hey ho

            Comment

            • winalotto
              Gold Seat
              • Mar 2009
              • 5524

              #7
              Originally posted by Bigdave
              I agree its f cuked us but some might say what goes around comes around.

              I still dont quite understand how the ref sent him off when he never saw anything and the lino never flagged but hey ho
              Totally agree..

              Comment

              • Shania
                C Club
                • Apr 2010
                • 23697

                #8
                Originally posted by QPR Richard
                Personally I don't give a stuff about what he did when he played for the Geordies. All I know is that a disgraceful decision by the ref and the FA has cost us big time while he's in a hooped shirt.

                I bet the refs and the FA do.
                That´s the problem, like it or not.
                QPR
                Best team in the world
                Sort of

                Comment

                • Del
                  Gold Seat
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 8393

                  #9
                  The play acting element is the same, and he can't argue the fact, however, there is a difference in that Gervinho actually did hit hit, which although not enough to knock him over, it did happen and is a sending off offence. He will say he just made it clear to the officials of what happened by going to ground.

                  He never actually did anything to the Norwich player to make him play act.... This along with the fact none of the active "match" officials deemed it relevant to call even as a foul when it happened, and this whole sending off and 3 match ban stinks.

                  Comment

                  • scuberry
                    Silver Seat
                    • Jun 2009
                    • 1882

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Bigdave
                    I agree its f cuked us but some might say what goes around comes around.

                    I still dont quite understand how the ref sent him off when he never saw anything and the lino never flagged but hey ho
                    Because the FA back there ref's to the hilt,right or wrong,NW was correct in saying you cannot have any faith in the appeals procedure unless you are a top 6 club...stinks tbh !!!

                    Comment

                    • winalotto
                      Gold Seat
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 5524

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Del
                      The play acting element is the same, and he can't argue the fact, however, there is a difference in that Gervinho actually did hit hit, which although not enough to knock him over, it did happen and is a sending off offence. He will say he just made it clear to the officials of what happened by going to ground.

                      He never actually did anything to the Norwich player to make him play act.... This along with the fact none of the active "match" officials deemed it relevant to call even as a foul when it happened, and this whole sending off and 3 match ban stinks.
                      Thats what confuses me, no one seems to have seen an offence, yet after the game continued and was stopped later he was sent off, still correct decision though because it was aggressive intent and had the ref seen it he would have walked. Was it spotted on a monitor and flagged up which shouldn't be allowed?

                      Comment

                      • Squirrel
                        Bronze Seat
                        • Mar 2009
                        • 581

                        #12
                        Originally posted by winalotto
                        Thats what confuses me, no one seems to have seen an offence, yet after the game continued and was stopped later he was sent off, still correct decision though because it was aggressive intent and had the ref seen it he would have walked. Was it spotted on a monitor and flagged up which shouldn't be allowed?
                        Agree as to there being some aggression but have to say the Norwich player would have definitely been given his marching his orders for his part in the 'theatrics'
                        Everyday Plumbers Bristol
                        63 Sommerville Road, Bristol, BS7 9AD.
                        0117 239 1217
                        http://redlandplumbing.co.uk/

                        Comment

                        • Sleeping Giants
                          Silver Seat
                          • Mar 2009
                          • 3253

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Bigdave
                          Sorry if already brought up but someone at work today commented that Barton slating Johnson for getting him sent off was the pot calling the kettle black after he did the same after a coming together with Gervinho in the Newcastle Arsenal game at the start of the season. Got to be honest i completely forgot about that and he does have a point.
                          I know I'm being really pedantic here but Hypercritical means something completely different to hypocritical. Your Arsenal reference suggests that you think he was Hypocritical.

                          Comment

                          • upperloftpaul
                            Bronze Seat
                            • Apr 2009
                            • 256

                            #14
                            As much as I am apalled by the joke sending and the usual stubborness of the FA too see common sense. I fear that our Joey is a victim of his own reputation!

                            Comment

                            • QPR Richard
                              Gold Seat
                              • Sep 2011
                              • 6489

                              #15
                              It comes to something when you're punished not by your actions but by your reputation. I think the whole business is pathetic, but there are some QPR fans who feel the ref and the FA got it spot on.

                              I disagree, and so do many within the game.
                              Supporting QPR isn't just about a football team. It's about roots and identity.

                              Comment

                              Working...