New Kit confirmed by Premier League Handbook

[bushcelt1]

OMG they are so S.H.I.T.

agreed.

[stainrod10]

In many cases others clubs fans would have seen this before ours as we have typically made no announcement.

Total shambles as ever.

[LoveRs]

it just shows how little regard the board has for our clubs identity!

Shocking we find out this way

[W12_Ranger]

Everyone was moaning there was not enough hoops in the past few seasons now there are to many?

Our fans lol

I personally love how many hoops there are.

How ****ing difficult is it to get the traditional hoops right, every ****ing season they balls it up.

I'm pretty certain the last time they got it right may have been a JD sport kit or quite possibly a Compaq kit.

You would love how many hoops there are as your a teenager and probably don't understand the signifance with getting the blue and white hoops right with many fans

[QPRbob]

Does anyone think our away kit could be Flabio's way of having a pop at us,many don't like it, I'm in the minority as I don't think it's that bad. He must be aware of his nickname, he may not of understood it but it sure has been explained to him.

[Nodge70]

What's the problem? Had thinner hoops in 1908 - 1922 and 76/77 and 2000-2002 (think Crouch in the relegation year and Stevie Palmer the year after). Had orange as a third kit before too. All this "not knowing our identity" is a bit hysterical and a bit ignorant of our history too IMO.

If you don't like it, don't buy it. It ain't compulsory.

Won't somebody pleeease think of the children

[QPRbob]

Here's our previous orange kit.

http://www.classicfootballshirts.co....rt-mint-l.html

[DeepcutHoop]

What's the problem? Had thinner hoops in 1908 - 1922 and 76/77 and 2000-2002 (think Crouch in the relegation year and Stevie Palmer the year after). Had orange as a third kit before too. All this "not knowing our identity" is a bit hysterical IMO.

If you don't like it, don't buy it. It ain't compulsory.

Won't somebody pleeease think of the children

Spot on.

Phrases like 'utter disgrace' being used about a kit that'll be used for one year is hysterical.

[BUSHRANGER1982]

I don't get this, "too many hoops", shyte.
I've always been of the opinion, that Queen's Park Rangers should take a leaf out of Celtic's book.
The classic Queen's Park Rangers kit, those pre-dating 1976-77, with more than five or six hoops, with hoops on the sleeves, should have been treasured, cherished, and ultimately protected.

[LoftusRoadLad]

Don't think it is an official home kit. I reckon that when the prem made that hand book they had to put something up . Unless its on QPR's offi....

[DeepcutHoop]

Don't think it is an official home kit. I reckon that when the prem made that hand book they had to put something up . Unless its on QPR's offi....

"That's the spirit, George. If nothing else works, then a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through."

- General Sir Anthony Cecil Hogmanay Melchett

[2touch]

I'm not a big fan of the away kits, but its no big deal!

Can't understand the problem with the home kit either. As long as they are blue and white hoops I am happy, and don't understand why everyone else wouldn't be!

[Rieger]

I'm not a big fan of the away kits, but its no big deal!

Can't understand the problem with the home kit either. As long as they are blue and white hoops I am happy, and don't understand why everyone else wouldn't be!

It's easier and more macho to #### something off than to praise it.

[RussRanger]

Can I just clarify something about the third kit?

Wasn't our "classic" strip of the 70's halved and not quarters? Some have said it was quartered but would like to have some photographic evidence to convince me we wore quarters. Not saying, they are wrong, just don't remember it.

[twranger]

It's easier and more macho to #### something off than to praise it.