Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

£5m for Connolly ?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • winalotto
    replied
    Don't you think its a hands off price though?
    Remember what price they wanted for Cook when Fulham first came in, and the price he eventually went for? i know circumstances were different but if Wolves and the other club went £3m would we sell ? i hope not.

    Leave a comment:


  • ScottJones
    replied
    Originally posted by mccoyranger1
    Keep him. One of the brightest young talents we have at this club. Why would we sell Matty, and how do you replace him?

    Sell Fitz Hall, get him off the wage bill, that would save us a few quid.
    Couldn't agree more. Was literally word for word my thoughts. :boss:

    And, yes, it is Wolves who are interested.

    Leave a comment:


  • mccoyranger1
    replied
    Keep him. One of the brightest young talents we have at this club. Why would we sell Matty, and how do you replace him?

    Sell Fitz Hall, get him off the wage bill, that would save us a few quid.

    Leave a comment:


  • PeterG
    replied
    Weve got Gorks, Stewart, Ramage is a better centre back than right back.

    if we have money to spend i would say certainly keep conolly but if the budget isnt there magilton will need to look if the team can generally be improved by selling conolly and buying in where we really need it

    Leave a comment:


  • HammersmithR
    replied
    Terrible decision to sell him. See players like Hall! We need to build a side with people like Connolly. He is one of the few players that if we did go up, we could build a side around as he is good enough.

    Leave a comment:


  • rangersroar
    replied
    Oh yeah, lets sell all our best players and end up in league one. Great idea. :what::(:horror:

    Leave a comment:


  • BuzsakyIsGod
    Guest replied
    We can't lose him! Jesus guys yes £5 million is a good offer but hello without him in defence it will fall apart. Keep the defence as it is!

    Don't go and sell our best players forgoodness sake! He needs to stay. I hope this isn't true.

    Leave a comment:


  • THE FLYING COW
    Guest replied
    the figure of money that i have been told is four millin but w have said we want four

    ive been told its four million,and its wolves

    Leave a comment:


  • barnethoop
    replied
    Originally posted by Squirrel
    I reckon Wolves. I think he'd do well in the prem but i hope we don't lose him :(
    yes probably, cant see burnley forking out that kind of money. Mr winalotto says there are 2 clubs interested so who is the other?

    Leave a comment:


  • Squirrel
    replied
    I reckon Wolves. I think he'd do well in the prem but i hope we don't lose him :(

    Leave a comment:


  • EYR
    replied
    To be honest we really do need to pull our socks up this year or our best players will be looking for moves next summer

    Leave a comment:


  • stan_bowles
    replied
    Imagine it would be Wolves to replace Mancienne.

    Leave a comment:


  • barnethoop
    replied
    That is a hell of a lot of money. But, Connolly is 21 and is only going to get better. If the club have serious ambitions they should not be selling players like him.

    I assume its either Burnley or Wolves who want him if Birmingham just bought Dann and have a very strong defence already. Who is the prem team interested?

    Leave a comment:


  • EYR
    replied
    Given Brum have just spent £4m on Scott Dann from Cov id put Connolly in the 4m bracket so would take 5m

    Leave a comment:


  • PeterG
    replied
    5m for conolly when was this price tag put on

    I would take it like a shot, I like connely he is good and versatile but we are not too bad on defenders and if transfer budged could get you 2 promotion winning strikers

    Leave a comment:

Working...