Who Gets The Nod Alongside Gorkss Tomorrow?

[JVC1962QPR]

Should be Connolly, but guess it will be Ramage

Tell us mate, why should it be Connolly? Has he been better than Ramage recently?

[brightonr]

I actually read the response in a really pompus authoritative tone in my head.

I think Paul talks a lot of sense a lot of the time.

I wholeheartedly disagree with his stance on Adel, although I can understand some of his reservations. Clearly you disagreed with him too.

However, he would no doubt be on your side if a debate took place on a "certain person", which I sincerely hope it won't.

Despite disagreeing with him on various issues, I have always found him to stick to his views, attempt to explain his reasons and do so in as civil a manner as possible when disagreeing with someone.

[W12_Ranger]

I think Paul talks a lot of sense a lot of the time.

I wholeheartedly disagree with his stance on Adel, although I can understand some of his reservations. Clearly you disagreed with him too.

However, he would no doubt be on your side if a debate took place on a "certain person", which I sincerely hope it won't.

Despite disagreeing with him on various issues, I have always found him to stick to his views, attempt to explain his reasons and do so in as civil a manner as possible when disagreeing with someone.

I totally agree, still no harm in ruining him every time Taarabt plays well, fully deserevd IMO. Has one poster ever got it so wrong on here as his stance on 'Two Ball', Paul won't respond to this as I'm on he's ignore list now

[paulmason]

I totally agree, still no harm in ruining him every time Taarabt plays well, fully deserevd IMO. Has one poster ever got it so wrong on here as his stance on 'Two Ball', Paul won't respond to this as I'm on he's ignore list now

Not af all, life is too short to worry about a difference of opinion. Explain the difference between my concerns and NW stating they are indeed true. I am happy he is playing well and long may it continue.

[brightonr]

I totally agree, still no harm in ruining him every time Taarabt plays well, fully deserevd IMO. Has one poster ever got it so wrong on here as his stance on 'Two Ball', Paul won't respond to this as I'm on he's ignore list now

A fiver says he will ?

[paulmason]

However, he would no doubt be on your side if a debate took place on a "certain person", which I sincerely hope it won't.

Who would that be ?

[paulmason]

w12 - Also, was i right when I said we would end up with aarabt because no one else wants him ? when you and others kept saying he will be at Barcalone, Madrid etc.

[brightonr]

Also, was i right when I said we would end up with hom because no one else wants him ? when you and others kept saying he will be at Barca, Madrid.

If you can point to where I came anywhere close to suggesting that, I would be most grateful. Unless of course you were ignoring W12.

[paulmason]

If you can point to where I came anywhere close to suggesting that, I would be most grateful. Unless of course you were ignoring W12.

Sorry Brighton, I was talking to w12 and have amended accordingly.

[W12_Ranger]

Not af all, life is too short to worry about a difference of opinion. Explain the difference between my concerns and NW stating they are indeed true. I am happy he is playing well and long may it continue.

Difference between your concerns and NW are pretty difficult to compare TBH Paul; ok despite the fact that your a fan and Warnock is the manager I'll try to my best.


* You never wanted Taarabt at the club at all costs, Warnock would have walked over hot coals to get him.

* You launched a venomous hate campaign, Warnock wanted to throw his arm around him at every opportunity and tell him its gonna be alright.

* You wanted to kick Taarabt in the ****** at every opportunity due to the negative aspects of his personality, Warnock wanted to offer praise and kindness to a difficult personality.


Do you get the picture, I can't really give you the answer you think you deserve because unlike you Warnock didn't haven't a massive chip on his shoulder in the first place with regards to Taarabt.

Warnock's a master with words and man management, he'll mention Adels attitude and in the same sentence explain how he deals with things. He lavishes praise on the player but takes a little bit of it away to keep the players feet on the ground.

Sorry mate that's the best I can do because if Warnock had your attitude and concerns Tarabat would have never had been signed and in Warnocks mind there was never any doubt about the signing him.

[rangersroar]

We should have loaned in Kilgallon in.

[qblockpete]

Cannot believe fans booed a year ago has suddenly become a better centre back than Connolly/

It really does amaze me. Ramage is not better, the fact is towards the end of last season we were playing pretty meaningless games.

Ramage is a very good cover right Back

[qblockpete]

w12ranger you often contradict yourself.

one hand defending NW over Taarabt, but having a right go over the potential signing of Walters.

[WeAreQPR12]

he also slated Neil for making Hall captain infact he slates Neil often.

[W12_Ranger]

w12ranger you often contradict yourself.

one hand defending NW over Taarabt, but having a right go over the potential signing of Walters.

he also slated Neil for making Hall captain infact he slates Neil often.

Please explain how this logic defines a contradiction.

So what you are saying is I have to consistently back Warnock (or go against) on every decision he makes with no middle ground otherwise I'm contradicting myself?

That is one of stupidest things I have ever heard, I take that every individual situation differently, it forms the basis for opinion and debate. If I contradict myself within the context of a specific subject area then that's not acceptable but your just trying to be pedantic for the sake off it.

Maybe the pair of you should try stop being smart ####'s as it doesn't seem to suit you.