I'm not saying we don't need goalscorers. I just believe that a fitter side with a tighter defence has more chance of winning matches than the one last season. If we don't concede we only have to score once whereas last season if we conceded one we'd be lucky to get a point. If we conceded two then it was game over. Of course if we had goalscorers we could concede two and still have a chance of winning it but a tighter defence means there is less pressure for the strikers.
Anyway, who's to say that if we spend £500k on Orr it means we have £500k less to spend on a striker?
Anyway, who's to say that if we spend £500k on Orr it means we have £500k less to spend on a striker?
A women fan reading this might take that a different way...
Comment