how do you like your egg............

[Youvebeenrangered]

OK who listen to radio 2 in morning. It great show

That was from a advert on the telly actually!

[maccatwo]

That was from a advert on the telly actually!

OK it also on radio 2 on Chris Evans show just after 8am

[swede]

sirppy old chap id love a decent rightback more than an evening of sodomisation with amanda mealing n jo joyner..... but bradley 'orr'dinary dont get my boat a floating.....the same player given a roasting by aggymang n hogan in the past............the new damien delaney! remember the wholsale ...w.....ankfest over him signing!!

If u had the possibility of an evening with Madeleine Albright and Jarmila Kratochvilova u would forget all about a decent RB

[Bigdave]

RB is the easiest position on the pitch to play, Connolly, Rowlands, Legiertwood or Ramage all capable of playing there.

Yes Connolly can do a job there but why ruin a good young centre half by playing him out of position.
And you say Ramage, Legs capable of playing there? I take it you havent seen Ramage play there then? And you must of missed the games Legs played there because as soon as he comes up against a nippy winger we are in big trouble.
We need Orr, simple as that.

[W12_Ranger]

Yes Connolly can do a job there but why ruin a good young centre half by playing him out of position.
And you say Ramage, Legs capable of playing there? I take it you havent seen Ramage play there then? And you must of missed the games Legs played there because as soon as he comes up against a nippy winger we are in big trouble.
We need Orr, simple as that.

Money is better spent on a forward and seeing as we are in the habit of not spending it why waste it on a RB when it can be put towards a forward. Off course, I have never seen Ramage, Legs or Connolly play RB how stupid of me to suggest they can do a job there!!!

Oh and seeing as your so worried about nippy wingers going at our Full Backs I'd be slightly more concerned about Clint Hill at LB because compared to Legs he is effectively a slug.

If we failed to bring in a decent striker outright and not on loan then Orr is effectively a luxury signing, first signing we should have made this summer was a marque signing up front instead here we are a week to the big KO no striker and quibbling about an average Championship defender.

[singingranger]

w12 - you weirdo -

[BennyBoyRs]

Morning facto...Fried, scrambled, poached or boiled with soldiers mate...???

[sirpiechucker]

Morning facto...Fried, scrambled, poached or boiled with soldiers mate...???

And certainly not fertilised!

[W12_Ranger]

w12 - you weirdo -

Why don't you write us another song, better still get a life.

[Spencer]

Why don't you write us another song, better still get a life.

Whereas I totally agree with you W12 - our first signing or our most Important signing, should be..a goalscorer.But, I assume that is also on every other teams agenda.

The rumour re " Silvan Ebanks at Nat West"...Strikers are hard to come by and strikers like Silvan, would probably be just as happy to stay at Wolves in the premiership than to actually drop a Div and play regular football at a lower standard...and maybe at lower wages....

Season after season, clubs chasing strikers in the Championship, the same old names appear. Hulse Stead Henderson Adebola etc etc....are there any new names out there woth a punt.

You could argue we were slow last season when chasing Hooper, who has now gone to Celtic.People were muting the idea about Simeon Jackson from Gillingham,but only Norwich took the plunge.Their fans seem pretty happy but ours were happy we didn.t sign him.

Actually...im waffling now

[W12_Ranger]

Whereas I totally agree with you W12 - our first signing or our most Important signing, should be..a goalscorer.But, I assume that is also on every other teams agenda.

The rumour re " Silvan Ebanks at Nat West"...Strikers are hard to come by and strikers like Silvan, would probably be just as happy to stay at Wolves in the premiership than to actually drop a Div and play regular football at a lower standard...and maybe at lower wages....

Season after season, clubs chasing strikers in the Championship, the same old names appear. Hulse Stead Henderson Adebola etc etc....are there any new names out there woth a punt.

You could argue we were slow last season when chasing Hooper, who has now gone to Celtic.People were muting the idea about Simeon Jackson from Gillingham,but only Norwich took the plunge.Their fans seem pretty happy but ours were happy we didn.t sign him.

Actually...im waffling now

I can't understand why fans are having kittens over signing a RB even the money of Kenny could have been saved to keep Cerny between the sticks who IMO is just as good. My point is as you well understand is that a striker has been a No.1 priority since day 1. It would be better blowing what funds we have available on a proven goal score that's the bottom line. I also dfo not see the benefit in bringing in a crocked Henderson, it just smacks of the same old same old to me.

With regards to signing Orr yes its good to have a proper FB but its certainly not a priority when you consider we have just signed a slow ageing centre half to play LB.

[Spencer]

I can't understand why fans are having kittens over signing a RB even the money of Kenny could have been saved to keep Cerny between the sticks who IMO is just as good. My point is as you well understand is that a striker has been a No.1 priority since day 1. It would be better blowing what funds we have available on a proven goal score that's the bottom line. I also dfo not see the benefit in bringing in a crocked Henderson, it just smacks of the same old same old to me.

With regards to signing Orr yes its good to have a proper FB but its certainly not a priority when you consider we have just signed a slow ageing centre half to play LB.

W12 - as most people / fans will have read or heard in life, when building a team,they usually build a spine. Keeper - centre half - Striker - and throw in an important DM these days.

The Kenny transfer i totally agree with, but it has been apparent for a few season now, we need a striker,of a decent quality.It would have been my main priority.

That said, looking at our team from last season...left and right backs were areas we need to address.So in fairness, if we do sign a decent right back, i can see why fans are getting excited.In fact - if we sign anyone half decent....fans get excited

Goalscorers are a hard commodity to find.To be honest, i'm baffled we haven't put an offer in for Simpson( or maybe with have)It would be a good starting point...

[sirpiechucker]

I can't understand why fans are having kittens over signing a RB even the money of Kenny could have been saved to keep Cerny between the sticks who IMO is just as good. My point is as you well understand is that a striker has been a No.1 priority since day 1. It would be better blowing what funds we have available on a proven goal score that's the bottom line. I also dfo not see the benefit in bringing in a crocked Henderson, it just smacks of the same old same old to me.

With regards to signing Orr yes its good to have a proper FB but its certainly not a priority when you consider we have just signed a slow ageing centre half to play LB.

I very rarely disagree with you but this is one of those times. I believe that you build from the back and even under Sousa where we extremely tight defensively we still lacked a natural right back. A player who knows his position, who knows his positioning and also offers something going forward is something we've lacked for a very long time. Maybe even since Bardsley.

[Spencer]

I very rarely disagree with you but this is one of those times. I believe that you build from the back and even under Sousa where we extremely tight defensively we still lacked a natural right back. A player who knows his position, who knows his positioning and also offers something going forward is something we've lacked for a very long time. Maybe even since Bardsley.

Nothing wrong with building from the back.But ultimately to win games we need to score goals.All very well having a good defence that can keep out goals.If we concede 0 we have evry chance of drawing a game, but if the oppo score one, we need at least 1 goal to get 1 point.

Many people will call that a very negative approach to football.
Last season, if we conceded, you always wondered where our goals were going to come from, so you can be as tight as you want at the back, but without goals....you win nothing.

Also - teams should defend from the front backwards.Midfielders are vital now in knowing their defensive roles.

I do apologise for waffling today....got home late from pub and still really feel rather light headed...

[W12_Ranger]

I very rarely disagree with you but this is one of those times. I believe that you build from the back and even under Sousa where we extremely tight defensively we still lacked a natural right back. A player who knows his position, who knows his positioning and also offers something going forward is something we've lacked for a very long time. Maybe even since Bardsley.

I think I'm getting a bit misinterpreted, I totally understand the need to build from the back but the point I am trying to make is above all else goalies defenders etc the priority is a striker always has been.

To me it looks like we have a very limited budget again, I'd be very surprised to see us making outlays of any significant proportion on strikers now. Thus what funds have been made available I'd have blown on an out an out goalscorer as they cost the most, then there is the fans questioning the same thing constantly for 3 years, its getting tedious.