Would you groundshare with Chelsea?

[Goddard]

Chelsea should never be allowed to play their football in Shepherds Bush. I don't think their fans would want it either.

True.

Too far from Woking.

[superhoop67]

Chelsea should never be allowed to play their football in Shepherds Bush. I don't think their fans would want it either.

They could always sample the exciting range of French Bistros on offer along the Uxbridge Rd

[80sCasual]

Let 'em eff off to Milton Keynes....or share Griffin Park

Agree, they can ground share with MK Dons, just don't let them anywhere near our borough,

[W12_Ranger]

Someone correct me if I'm wrong but the Siemans site is the Unigate Site.

The Siemans Buildings are on your LHS as you turn off the A40 into Wood Lane???

Love it posted that this afternoon, ain't none of you local enough to respond?

[Sam-QPR]

the siemens buildings are opposite the first bbc buildings on wood lane (a40 direction. so you would be correct

[bushkangaroo]

My hatred of all things Chelsea is almost as strong as my love for Rangers. I would be suicidal if they moved anywhere near W12 area. BTW, that's a NO to Scott's question, no groundsharing with them anywhere, ever. Fulham or Brentford maybe...different question.

[qpr10]

AGREED NO WAY!

Although if they do find a new plot i know a man who can sell them some second hand steel!

[NW9_RANGER]

new stadium with no restricted views and proper legroom. groundshare? yes please

[Receed R]

i voted no

i mean who wants to share with the scu*m

im sure amit has plans in place for new stadia once we get to the prem

[nuffieldranger]

I voted no for the fact it is chelsea, but with a business head on it would be a much more viable way to do things bigger stadium shared bills and staff, also they could maybe add a car park which could be utilized to bring in extra revenue during the week

[bertiebasset]

If they bring in money for us why not?? Milan & Inter much more a rivalry then are pretend one share a ground, Lazio & Roma share a ground. I couldnt give a monkeys.

Chelsea aint bothered about us

i agree,would cut costs dramatically and free up money to spend on more important commodities ie a better class of player,isn't that what we all want at the end of the day?

[bertiebasset]

Groundsharing is an idea that certainly shouldn't be ruled out immediately and there are already plenty of working examples:

Allianz Arena - Bayern Munich & 1860 Munich
San Siro - AC Milan & Inter Milan
Stadio Olymipco - AS Roma & Lazio
Maracana - Botafogo, Flamengo & Fluminense

I'm lucky enough to be visiting the brand-new Meadowlands Stadium in New York this July. It has been purpose-built to house both the NY Giants and NY Jets NFL teams plus host concerts etc. I'll give you some feedback after my visit - but I'm guessing it wont be too shabby !!

From a pure financial point of view - it makes perfect sense for a stadium to host as many events as possible - not just one match every over week.

One sticking point though - both parties MUST enter as equal partners !!

As things stand, we would be rattling around in a 60,000-seat stadium as things stand. However, I guess we all hope that we'll soon be playing football attractive enough to draw in 60,000 in the not too distant future !?

20,000 would be nice!!!!!!

[80sCasual]

If I had paid out for a season ticket the thought of knowing a **** #### will have been sitting in my seat too makes me feel sick, especially when we are the away team and you will probably see one of them sitting in it.