Would you groundshare with Chelsea?

[Rangersw12]

If they bring in money for us why not?? Milan & Inter much more a rivalry then are pretend one share a ground, Lazio & Roma share a ground. I couldnt give a monkeys.

Chelsea aint bothered about us

I beg to differ with the amount of "lads" they turned out at the cup games

[Hertford Hoop]

I say no share at all unless it is within W12 and it is clear it is our ground and they would be squatting only, charge them £10m a year for the priv

[Robsondinho]

I beg to differ with the amount of "lads" they turned out at the cup games

Not exactly milan or rome derby though is it, and they ground share so I wouldnt care if we did. Chelsea's 'lads' aint what they used to be either as I saw with the slaps they took at the broadway.

[EYR]

Why would we ever need to?

[QPR1234]

id have them here.. they would bring us in champions league money.. or is our stadium not viable for champions league standards?

eitherway id have them for the amount of money they would bring to our stadium/club.

[Goddard]

Why would we ever need to?

In case we ever get any good, and need a bigger ground.. but want to share the costs, and not end up like Cardiff and Southampton who have grounds they couldn't afford?

I nearly convinced myself then.

But never with Chelsea. Fulham in the borough? Maybe.

[1cliveallen]

given that theyre a sarf london mob whose fanbase is the m4 corridor why move to the classier part of town to be spat on by their far richer classier neighbours?

[Rangersw12]

Not exactly milan or rome derby though is it, and they ground share so I wouldnt care if we did. Chelsea's 'lads' aint what they used to be either as I saw with the slaps they took at the broadway.

Its not the biggest derby in the world but to say they don't care about us is wide of the mark and I would never step foot if we shared a ground with them

If we shared with Fulham at White Ciy I wouldn't have a problem

[Gtleighsr3]

Yes,if it was an equal share.Be great facilities etc.Milan teams do it why cant we.There still arch rivals but share to there clubs benefit.Think it would be great myself.

[Blonkie]

We would not be the first ...

Groundsharing is an idea that certainly shouldn't be ruled out immediately and there are already plenty of working examples:

Allianz Arena - Bayern Munich & 1860 Munich
San Siro - AC Milan & Inter Milan
Stadio Olymipco - AS Roma & Lazio
Maracana - Botafogo, Flamengo & Fluminense

I'm lucky enough to be visiting the brand-new Meadowlands Stadium in New York this July. It has been purpose-built to house both the NY Giants and NY Jets NFL teams plus host concerts etc. I'll give you some feedback after my visit - but I'm guessing it wont be too shabby !!

From a pure financial point of view - it makes perfect sense for a stadium to host as many events as possible - not just one match every over week.

One sticking point though - both parties MUST enter as equal partners !!

As things stand, we would be rattling around in a 60,000-seat stadium as things stand. However, I guess we all hope that we'll soon be playing football attractive enough to draw in 60,000 in the not too distant future !?

[scott_jones]

blame Scott, it's his thread

I voted no!

[W12_Ranger]

Someone correct me if I'm wrong but the Siemans site is the Unigate Site.

The Siemans Buildings are on your LHS as you turn off the A40 into Wood Lane???

[BUSHRANGER1982]

I voted no!

Scott, hang thy head in shame. Share a ground with Chelshyte? I'd sooner share a bed with my ex-missus, and I've a weak stomach, I can tell yer!

Note to Mods. Need a "vomit" thingymajig, urgently.

[andover66]

NO

[rangersroar]

Chelsea should never be allowed to play their football in Shepherds Bush. I don't think their fans would want it either.