Would you take Hugill Back on loan?

[SoCal]

Only 1 goal and 0 assists played in 11 games, he seemed to enjoy his time here.

[Jeffqpr]

Not while he is out injured & when fit nah

[loftbalcony]

No and no

[72bus]

Yes if fit , why not

[Stainrod]

Not for me , we have 3 strikers of our own .

Although I guess using the term striker is a bit too optimistic!

[MYU]

I think Dykes is better and you guys haven't really given the him a chance yet.

He plays here, goes on International duty and back again. It takes time for players to gel and all the players improve going forward now.

[Ronnie Rangers]

I think Dykes is better and you guys haven't really given the him a chance yet.

He plays here, goes on International duty and back again. It takes time for players to gel and all the players improve going forward now.

Totally agree.

[WeAreQPR12]

I'd have peter crouch back over this useless jock

[3London]

Hugill was best for us when he had wells along side him - for dykes to be his most effective we need to play 2 up front - the Best Strikers in recent times have been in duo's Dykes and either Bonne or Kelman needs play every game and form a partnership. Letting Wells leave was the biggest mistake we have made in recent times - especially if we know we had the Eze money coming in - Dykes and Wells would have been fantastic in this division.

[Shania]

Yes, I would have liked to have Hugill back on loan, and the problem with Wells was wages.

[Stainrod]

Hugill was best for us when he had wells along side him - for dykes to be his most effective we need to play 2 up front - the Best Strikers in recent times have been in duo's Dykes and either Bonne or Kelman needs play every game and form a partnership. Letting Wells leave was the biggest mistake we have made in recent times - especially if we know we had the Eze money coming in - Dykes and Wells would have been fantastic in this division.

I agree we need to go 2 upfront to get the best out of our strikers . Letting Wells go was not a mistake though , we couldn’t afford his fee or wages .It wouldn’t be right to pay Wells double what any other player was on , when we have a wage structure in place .

[SheepRanger]

We will not generate money from future player sales by playing loan players. I think Dykes will come good but we have Kelman coming through. Loan players are out!

[Qprtanpa1]

Agree re Wells; not re Hugill. Dykes is gonna develop into a very solid player. Needs time.

[FurtiveFox]

if we need a boost in January someone like him and another loan or two could be useful.

[3London]

I agree we need to go 2 upfront to get the best out of our strikers . Letting Wells go was not a mistake though , we couldn’t afford his fee or wages .It wouldn’t be right to pay Wells double what any other player was on , when we have a wage structure in place .

true but most clubs have players on higher wages than others - every team in the Premier league - i know we are trying to do things right now but there is no point balancing the books in the 3rd tier of football...